Satirical logic for the atheistic mind

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

I disagree, scientist are drawing conclusions about planets they have never seen,

 

EVERYONE draws conclusions about things they have never seen (a little thing called 'inference'), but the conclusions drawn by science are always and without exception provisional ones.  That is  what makes science 'science', instead of amateurish conjecture, which is the province of religion.

like they are this or they are that. When in reality they have no clue about those unseen planets.

 
I'm sure you don't realize it, but that statement in a glaring admission that you haven't the foggiest notion of what science is or how it works.

Many scientist today are writing things just to throw papers and information out there so they can claim they were the first to say this or that when and if those things are proven.

I'd be delighted if you could name a single scientist who is doing this, and reference the paper in which they did it, and the journal which published it.

 

This comes from scientist that are becoming disappointed by the way science is turning to guessing for the sake of fame.

See my response immediately prior:  Which scientists are disappointed?  Which scientists are 'guessing'?  For bonus points, can you -without resorting to Wikipedia - name 10 famous, living scientists?

Boru