(June 2, 2018 at 2:06 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: It depends on the Angle and context.
For example "God created all things" a person might argue, did he create himself?
But that person is an idiot. Language wasn't spoken to suit the desires of people seeking faults like this generation.
(June 2, 2018 at 2:02 pm)paulpablo Wrote: If a statement contains the word "all" it has something to do with exception in the sense that it negates any possibility of exceptions relating to the statement.
If I make one statement that contradicts the other by one saying there's an exception and the other saying there's no exceptions, that's not a different angle. Why would god write a book containing points of view from different angles anyway? It's just a contradiction. Speaking from someone reading it in English that is.
"He doesn't forgive the association" Means the action of association is not forgiven. Not that it is forgiven in some circumstances. Again just speaking as someone reading that statement in English.
I would speak to a person who studied linguistics or studies law, and they will tell you all about exceptions and exceptions to exceptions....
I am going to leave it at that.
I speak English too. You are talking none-sense.
And again, this is nothing to do with exceptions, but different angles.. "he forgiven not the association" means the type of association they were doing, if they leave it and repent from it, they are no longer associating and will be forgiven like so many other verses clarify.
Honestly, when Atheists claim they honestly asses divine books, this is one reason I Can't take their claims seriously.
It's nonsense, not none-sense. And "He forgiven not the association" is nonsense. I mean that statement literally doesn't make sense so I don't even know where to begin talking to you about it.
I haven't claimed to "asses" any divine books.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.