RE: What is your problem with Atheism?
May 30, 2018 at 4:20 pm
(This post was last modified: May 30, 2018 at 4:21 pm by Simon Moon.)
(May 30, 2018 at 12:09 am)MysticKnight Wrote:(May 29, 2018 at 11:58 pm)ignoramus Wrote: You have deeply offended my delicate carefully constructed lack of belief.
Theists generally tell me :If you don't believe in God, you don't believe in anything.
I say to them: If you don't believe in the natural world around you, make some shit up instead!
I don't accept mythology without a Creator. You can call your mythology science and say you have evidence, but you don't. I use to believe Science deeply because a lot of made sense and seemed intuitive.
So, you presuppose a creator is necessary, then shoehorn all of science into your presupposition. Not much chances of confirmation bias there. No sir.
Quote:I use to believe in evolution.
And you used to be correct.
Now you have to ignore: genetic, comparative anatomy, fossil record, and other sources of evidence to disbelieve evolution.
Congratulations for becoming willfully ignorant.
Quote:But just like philosophy, if you stay at medium layer, you become Atheist, but if you go deeply, you unravel treasures that prove God, the same is true to me now of science and irreducible complexity.
Not a single example of 'irreducible complexity' is actually irreducibly complex. You haven't been keeping up with current science.
Quote:My biggest problem with Atheists is they act like they know all about the evidence, when they don't. They make as if they research science deeply, but they have not.
Most atheist do have a deeper knowledge of the sciences.
After all, 72% of scientists are atheists.
Quote:Everything they study is just a superficial level that the education system directed them to and appealed with.
BS.
Quote:Go deeper - for the truth.
Please provide a method that I can follow to 'go deeper'.
Quote:You are not the only jury for what stands for evidence of God. Everyone can decide that.
True.
Some people allow for poor evidence for their god.
Fallacious philosophical arguments, ancient texts, personal experience, are not good evidence.
Quote:You hold the stance there is none, I just don't find anyone you capable of digesting a proper argument for God to be honest. Even Jo at the end, to me at least didn't seem to understand the witness argument as I presented when she responded.
We've all refuted your fallacious arguments.
Not our fault that you fail at basic logic.
Quote:So I don't know what it is, something, just keeps what otherwise very clear - from clicking.
Maybe it's not our fault for not understanding your 'very clear arguments. Maybe they are simply fallacious. That would be my guess.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.