(October 2, 2018 at 1:16 pm)Divinity Wrote: Sounds like a good idea to me. Who's going to represent the interests of 50% of their customers? And that's not to mention their employees. An all male board is just making it a boys club. And of course, more female board members means more female CEO's. There shouldn't be such a gender gap in boardrooms across the country.
Is this a perfect solution? Fuck no. But it's necessary because right now so many of these boardrooms are nothing more than boys clubs. They certainly aren't hiring the 'best people' anyway. They're hiring the people with all the right connections.
Do you really think the typical woman who are likely to become candidate for the board share much the interests of typical woman customer, much less those whose interested are effected but who are not customers?
