(December 13, 2018 at 10:55 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:(December 13, 2018 at 10:47 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: By "my behavior", you mean me having given my thoughts on that thread? If so, I've already admitted that I shouldn't have. I still stand by those thoughts, but it is true that I shouldn't have made them public.
That's one of the shoes. The other is whether you were making an unjustified conclusion about the facts.
I stand by that conclusion, as the evidence is pretty overwhelming, especially now. I won't be talking about it though, as I am trying to avoid doing the same thing I did on AD. It'll just cause more damage to the person in question.
Anyway, it's kind of counter productive that this is all being brought out into the open here on AF. It was already spilled on AD when it should have been said privately. Now it is just being further spread around.
Names were brought up (mine included), accusing us of doxing, ganging up on, and bullying, and it was said that we should be blamed for the member's absence. So I felt I should say something about that because I felt it was unfair and inaccurate. But I have otherwise no intention of bringing this here or repeating my mistake by talking about it again.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
