(January 27, 2019 at 1:55 am)Anomalocaris Wrote:(January 26, 2019 at 10:03 pm)Shell B Wrote: There is no design. Correct. However, there is a blueprint in our DNA, and we function according to that. Our blueprints are all different. Therefore, gender "normalcy" is defined by the individual's blueprint. What would be absurd is behaving in a way other than what comes naturally to you, as defined by your DNA, life experience, womb development (lots of stuff going on then), etc. It would be me feeling like a guy, but acting like a girl because some random dude thinks I should.
Function according to DNA is a dangerous statement as far as origin of behavior is concerned. Also it is probably also a gross over simplification of what is encompassed in the really very multi-faceted meaning of gender “normalcy” to assert it is defined by an individual’s genes.
I mean, I did say it’s part of the package, not the entire origin, so I don’t understand your argument.
