RE: New gulf war?
May 26, 2019 at 7:04 am
(This post was last modified: May 26, 2019 at 7:10 am by WinterHold.)
(May 25, 2019 at 9:04 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(May 25, 2019 at 8:25 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: ========================
atlass journals: May 25, 2019:
News from the Persian gulf are not good, neither do they promise with anything other than more beating on the drums of war. The U.S is sending troops and reinforcements for its forces guarding America's interests in the region, along with B-52 bombers and an aircraft carrier.
This is terribly alarming because B-52s were made to carry nuclear weapons, so it's a matter of 1 single rash decision now to be taken by the American administration for nuclear apocalypse to start.
After a storm of mutual threats, Iran threatened that it has secret weapons capable of sinking American ships:
https://sputniknews.com/world/2019052510...-warships/
Having Russian and Chinese merchants and allies at its disposal Iran can sure have weapons like these; consider the example of North Korea's nuclear program.
Iran has strong friends; and is being bullied by a group of psychopaths..a hit is the only logical consequence.
1. News from the Persian Gulf is almost never good.
No; things were "stable", i.e you won't hear about moving of large segments of the U.S army there. But now the U.S's activity is "huge" and it has all what it needs to start a new invasion in the region.
Many allies of the U.S in the region want war too (KSA, UAE,Israel).
The situation was never like this since the gulf war.
Quote:4. Yes, B52s are bombers. But in almost sixty years of deployment, no B52 has ever dropped a nuclear weapon, not once.
There is this thing: if you give somebody a gun, sooner or later they're gonna shoot real bullets from it, either by mistake or intentionally.
There is no limit for the stupidity and corruption of Trump as it seems. The maniac seems like an asshole who can drop a nuclear bomb from a B-52 to escape the investigations of his political enemies back in America.
Quote:5. It has always been a matter of one rash decision to deploy nuclear weapons.
Correct ! and we come full circle with Trump, MBS, MBZ,Bbib
Quote:6. The deployment of a nuclear weapon doesn't automatically mean 'a nuclear apocalypse'.
The chain reaction produced by such strike will be nuclear apocalypse.
It's like making "sex" a taboo: everybody will fear having sex at first. But if somebody broke the taboo and had it, everybody will have it.
And this will be the second time; remember Japan?
Quote:7. Iran has secret weapons? Really? Remember, this is the country that decided it could sink an aircraft carrier after they pretended to sink a wooden mockup of an aircraft carrier. This is the equivalent of claiming you can kill a grizzly bear with your hands because you punched a teddy bear.
Aside from the amplified statements, Iran does have fatal capabilities in small sea areas like the gulf; they can easily sink American boats , this missile is an example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS-N-22
Iran will not be a winner in this war. But it will hurt the U.S so badly, the civil unrest in the U.S will be its fall.
Quote:8. You really, seriously think that Russia and China are going to allow a war that would (as you claim) disrupt oil supplies?
If their governments has "Oligarchs" like Putin; then yes. Probably they think -the loot will be huge if they emerged victorious from such war, their governments are not a single entity.
Just like America today: the government is something, Trump is something else.
(May 25, 2019 at 9:12 am)Deesse23 Wrote:(May 25, 2019 at 8:25 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: This is terribly alarming because B-52s were made to carry nuclear weapons, so it's a matter of 1 single rash decision now to be taken by the American administration for nuclear apocalypse to start.
Once again, you have no clue what you are talking about, just wallowing in your hysteria.
B52s, are excellent in dropping conventional ordnance, because they can carry a shitload of it. Thats what they have been used for, again and again.
If you want to drop a nuke, single (multi warhead) is enough, and you want to make sure it gets to target. Thats when you choose the B2.
No. B-52 were made to carry nuclear bombs:
Quote:The B-52 took its maiden flight in April 1952. Built to carry nuclear weapons for Cold War-era deterrence missions, the B-52 Stratofortress replaced the Convair B-36. A veteran of several wars, the B-52 has dropped only conventional munitions in combat. The B-52's official name Stratofortress is rarely used; informally, the aircraft has become commonly referred to as the BUFF (Big Ugly Fat Fella/Fucker).[7][8][9][Note 1][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-52#cite_note-11][/url]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-52