(July 16, 2019 at 4:00 pm)Shell B Wrote:(July 16, 2019 at 2:48 pm)Drich Wrote: when did he say this?
I assume that must be his confusion, since he told four brown women who are born in the United States, most of them from parents who were born in the United States to "go back to the countries they are from." What's up with that?
Those four people represent anti capitalist anti-democratic republic rhetoric, and are pushing agendas and manifestos closer to communism than their socialist peers.
Trump telling them to go back to the place of your origins means to go back where your people are from as they are all currently living is a s-hole. Fix or demonstrate your ideas work , refine them and bring them back here. This is no different than Jesus saying take the plank out of your own eye before you worry about the speck in my eye. (take care of you and yours before worrying about the problems of others) even if this is limited to detroit the bronx boston and chicago, those are america's shite-holes.. Fix that before trying to use the policies that turned america's most industrious cities into poverty prisons. Or better yet on a larger scale why not go back to the country of origin and fix them? would that not make the world a better place?
Then take what I said into the OP into consideration. When polis was attacked by these four for being racist Even Trump who probably does not invite polsi over for weekends at any of his resorts, (she wanted to impeach him for most of his presidency) defended the fact that she is not a racist simple because she was trying to reign these out of control freshmen in.
Like wise by him taking a harsh stance that could be turned into a racist comment will force the dims to either support or abandon the 4 freshmen. if they support them trump can identify them and align them with their brand of communism. (watch the debates) if they do not support them Trump will be able to use the non supporting 'dims' as a wedge that will divide the dim-o-cratic party. which will split the vote and cause the middle left dims vote for him.
It's a strategic move. you people think he is a racist anyway, so what is there to loose? then look at what he has to gain... either ammo at the debate that will allow him to blow away any BS for radical left candidates trying to pretend they are representing the middle. or he can use non supporting dims as a wedge to further divide the party, just because people like you think it is a crime to tell someone if they don't like it go home and make your BS work there first then come back here with a refined idea.
