(August 15, 2019 at 11:45 am)Simon Moon Wrote: But I've been here for years, and all we've ever heard from you, is flawed argument after flawed argument, and bad evidence. I am not so sure it is being rude or arrogant to point out when someone is making flawed arguments. Especially when almost everyone here has pointed it out.
If I make a flawed argument and provide bad evidence for one of my beliefs, I love when someone points it out to me. One of my motivations in life is, to hold as many true beliefs as possible, and eliminate as many false beliefs as possible. I care if my beliefs are true or not.
I don't want to beat a dead horse, so I'll say this and leave it alone. I don't call the testimony of three different people who I know well a flawed argument or bad evidence - especially since each saw the same thing at different times. This is in addition to other people who I knew who testified to to similar or other supernatural experiences. If a ghost is not a natural phenomenon, then science doesn't necessarily have the means to determine their existence through scientific processes. Why limit yourself to only one avenue to determining the truth? I respect the fact that you don't believe it, but I don't limit myself to natural science in my search for truth.
