^^^ An excellent example of the equivocation errors / pitfalls I am bemoaning in other threads... loads of weak semantics:
Object (thing) vs. objective (universal) vs. objective (in relation to goals);
One's nature vs. of nature;
Value vs. values.
Added bonus, the non sequitur of values-to-facts.
And, for fun, the limiting of 'life' to a quantitative metric (availability) thus ignoring the qualitative metric (capacity / performance).
igh:
Object (thing) vs. objective (universal) vs. objective (in relation to goals);
One's nature vs. of nature;
Value vs. values.
Added bonus, the non sequitur of values-to-facts.
And, for fun, the limiting of 'life' to a quantitative metric (availability) thus ignoring the qualitative metric (capacity / performance).
igh:
The PURPOSE of life is to replicate our DNA ................. (from Darwin)
The MEANING of life is the experience of living ... (from Frank Herbert)
The VALUE of life is the legacy we leave behind ..... (from observation)
The MEANING of life is the experience of living ... (from Frank Herbert)
The VALUE of life is the legacy we leave behind ..... (from observation)
