RE: Arguments against Soul
September 23, 2019 at 11:10 pm
(This post was last modified: September 23, 2019 at 11:14 pm by Succubus.)
(September 23, 2019 at 10:52 pm)Belaqua Wrote: ...Ah, well, he intentionally chose a bollocks definition, and tried to show that it's bollocks. So he's proven nothing.
Give me your definition of the soul. And this:
Quote:(For the record, I define soul differently. I think there's no reason to think that soul, as traditionally defined, lives on after death. Though of course some people take this as an article of faith.)
The mustard will not cut.
'I define soul differently.' Yes, get on with it.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.