RE: Arguments against Soul
September 26, 2019 at 4:48 am
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2019 at 4:52 am by Succubus.)
Quote:...So let's take as an example the muscles in your leg. They have both matter and form [soul]. The matter, I guess, is flesh. The form is the way the flesh is structured, and the things it does. But obviously, the things it does depend on the presence of the flesh -- the form or soul isn't there if the flesh isn't there. And the flesh depends for its existence (as flesh) on the form, because flesh which lost its form would decay immediately, into whatever the constituent parts are...
I think you're taking the piss.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.