RE: Arguments against Soul
September 26, 2019 at 9:34 am
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2019 at 9:35 am by Succubus.)
(September 26, 2019 at 9:16 am)Grandizer Wrote:(September 26, 2019 at 9:06 am)Succubus Wrote: Beautiful.
To add to that:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sq_FhUbWz7k
Minute 44 - 49.30 is the uppercut that floors the mystics.
Only it won't.
Why would "woo-ists" agree that we have all the ingredients we need for reality in electrons and such? I feel like Sean Carroll is begging the question here in favor of naturalism ... which is fine, except those who disagree with him don't accept naturalism?
Naturalism:
Quote:The doctrine that the world can be understood in scientific terms without recourse to spiritual or supernatural explanations.
Is the only game in town. Of course the woomeisters disagree!
But then science doesn't give any sort of fuck what they think.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.