RE: Arguments against Soul
September 26, 2019 at 10:53 am
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2019 at 11:24 am by Succubus.)
Quote:But you guys are acting like physics is done. As if we understand everything so well we can definitively rule out these things...
As far as psychics, astrologers and afterlife proponents are concerned, it is.
Quote:Again, I'm not saying that there is a soul -
Quote:My point here is that I think there is potential for a type of "soul"
So which is it?
Quote:Don't put me in the boat with Christians, like Succumb or whatever just did. I respect scientific theory. It's the best method of getting as close as possible to objective truths.
What Succumb is saying is, science is the only way to establish facts as to how the natural world works. If you want truth, philosophy is down the hall.
Quote:I think you're acting almost unscientific in your dismissal of the probability of discovering new things about how we operate, and if there really is anything more to us that impacts the world around us besides what we already know.
Where did anyone say this?
Quote:I think it's worth leaving a bit of wiggle room because...
There is no wiggle room. There is no soul. Of any type.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.