@Gae Bolga I'll content that there is a soul, and use your definitions that it is meaningfully non-natural and leaves people's bodies. Given those were true, why would a list of natural properties (P) be mutually exclusive to the functioning properties (F) of an other (x)? for example, If I (primary natural X) were to create a robot (other x) why couldn't that x have the same ability to calculate, think, decide, move an elbow identical to X. x could be designed, or learn, P so that they're included in the F of x.
Let's just deal with the NDEs and supernatural paths to a soul then work on the others and set A's relation to the others. I believe nonphysical veridical perception of NDEs are best explained by substance duality than a physical-ist view. I believe ghost and apparitions are too common and specific to be explained as our minds playing tricks on us and is better answered if ghosts are either derivative soul or spirit in unrest.
Let's just deal with the NDEs and supernatural paths to a soul then work on the others and set A's relation to the others. I believe nonphysical veridical perception of NDEs are best explained by substance duality than a physical-ist view. I believe ghost and apparitions are too common and specific to be explained as our minds playing tricks on us and is better answered if ghosts are either derivative soul or spirit in unrest.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
