(January 13, 2020 at 1:13 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote:(January 13, 2020 at 11:15 am)Mr Greene Wrote: You're the one who claimed it was 'ancient'... I made no remarks about its popularity, nor do I see the relevance of popularity to the claims you made in the OP.
If you base your claims on the age of the text it is beaten by the Sumerians, Egyptians, Greeks, Hindus, Mayans, etc. none of whom ever spoke to Homo erectus..
Of course you made a remark about the popularity of Islam:
Quote:Mr Greene Wrote:
The Q'ran was written 609-632. Hardly that ancient and robbing the people of the middle east of their Sumerian heritage.
You went off to criminalize the choice of people calling it "robbery", despite us knowing that Islam is a religion, not a human being to "rob" people of anything.
Buddy; people chose that religion. Accusations of "robbery" do not live in the vocabulary of any decent human; but only live and thrive in the mentality of a defeated bunch who feel overwhelmed in front of a threat.
And don't listen to rightist crap. It's not good for your health.
The OP though..what do you say discussing it?
The leaders of the religion who wrote the book were lying, defrauding their followers as they continue to do. That has nothing to do with popularity. It's just another scam making claims they can't back up and never intended to honour.
Quote:I don't understand why you'd come to a discussion forum, and then proceed to reap from visibility any voice that disagrees with you. If you're going to do that, why not just sit in front of a mirror and pat yourself on the back continuously?-Esquilax
Evolution - Adapt or be eaten.