(February 8, 2020 at 4:31 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote:(February 8, 2020 at 4:17 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: That's theologians for you - always going about telling God what to do.
Boru
edit: Physicists too, come to think of it.
OFC. All theology is an attempt to put boundary conditions on the divine. Within the context of plantingas christian god there would be a logical contradiction unless some caveat of necessity discharged the moral responsibilities god has by virtue of his nature.
Or, in simpler terms.....god would be logically inconsistent with itself - shorthand for nonexistent in rational theology. Hence, the necessity of theodicy and defense.
Agreed, and I think that's largely the trouble. I'm perfectly happy to accept the premise that God is unable to act in a manner inconsistent with his nature, but theologians are continually tinkering with God's nature until they get something they're comfortable with. Then they publish it and the kerfuffle starts all over.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson