(January 22, 2020 at 4:39 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:Which is why i empathised mainstream .Not reviewed by the ID fan club .Of course their counter is(January 22, 2020 at 3:16 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: The nobel prize for overturning the cornerstone of modern biology and replacing it with ID ..........Oh wait that's never happened
The mountain of peer reviewed mainstream articles that have overturned the current paradigm and demonstrated ID ..... Oh wait all the have is blogs ,pop books ,And lectures by celebrity liars for christ .
Well...
To be honest, they have created their own journals, with ID peers, so they can claim to have had peer reviewed articles.
One is called "BIO-Complexity" and was started by...wait for it...that bastian of intellectual honesty, The Discovery Institute. And of course, long refuted Behe and Dembsky are on the editorial staff.
But you know what they say, a peer review journal is only as good as the peers doing the reviews.
It's all and evil conspiracy
But but Douglas Axe (failed)
But the Design inference is used by X (it isn't)
But famous long dead scientists (sorry doesn't count )
But on or two guys agree with us (lol)
All worthless
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM