Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position

[Abaddon_ire]

Just the one? OK. Paramārtha.

One not enough now?

OK

Muhammad al Warraq, Ibn al-Rawandi, Al-Razi, Al-Maʿarri (he was fun)

5 not enough now? Want more?

I think I explicitly said : in Muhammad's era. None of these guys witnessed Muhammad. In any case, you our al-Warraq /al Rawandi guys rejected the prophecy, not God's existence per se.  Atheism had a different meaning back then, you should look it up [Hint: it didn't mean not believing in God].

They all are Mo's era. If you are simply going to flat out lie, no further discourse is in any way useful. You are simply going to lie

Can god commit suicide, terminate his own existence? If yes, then not eternal. If no then not omnipotent.
The objections to omniscience and omnipotence remain the same.

These are not objections. They are newbie logical mistakes. God's very existence entails eternity, saying that God can't stop being eternal, or, equivalently, can't commit suicide is a vacuous sentence.

Then you have sunk your own battleship. If your god is incapable of stopping from being eternal, the he/she/it/housecat is clearly not omnipotent.

Furthermore, you claim to know something that he/she/it/housecat is prohibited from doing. How do you know that? And why is an omnipotent being unable to do anything at all?