"Defeating Trump is more important than all of us"

[The Architect Of Fate]

Conservative apologist arguments? Ok. Guess I'm just the crazy conspiracy guy here, that thinks there was fuckery going on with the primary in 2016, just like there's fuckery going on now, and I just need to fall in line when the only candidate who actually cares about my vote doesn't get the nomination?

Here is a good article addressing the idiotic conspiracy theories of the DNC rigging the primary.

I can link articles too 

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/...016-215774

https://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-p...democracy/

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekl...ie-sanders

https://nypost.com/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-cha...m-primary/





For all her faults even Warren isn't dishonest enough to deny it 

But this is all CONSERVATIVE talking points

---

Democrats who vote in bad leaders elect Republicans

---

It's not conservative apologetics it's realism

I don't think it's helpful to label arguments as "liberal apologetics" or "conservative apologetics"... I am more concerned with how logical an argument is rather than whether liberals or conservatives tend to use the specific argument. It only serves to further divide Democrats and liberals and doesn't really help us in any way.

So, did Hillary push a lot of people toward Trump? Yeah, I'd probably say so. But, so what? I think the more important thing is we all vote Democrat this year.

I can agree only in part