(April 5, 2011 at 6:51 pm)tackattack Wrote: 5-legally there is nothing to do because we do have the letter of the law, and can't prosecute based off of intent. I don't have to personally accept it, or publicly/ socially condone it. I can justifiably condemn it publicly because it is intentionally circumventing the letter of the law and running all over the intent of that law, hence my reason for the follow up discussion.Not it's not, it's neither circumventing the letter or the spirit of the law, that law is made to protect the children and teenagers, for example if a 22 years old made to look like a 16 years old started a porn where he was raped, neither the spirit or the letter of the law was circumvented because no children or teenagers were needed to be protected.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 11, 2024, 1:27 am
Poll: Pornography - are you for or against it and why? This poll is closed. |
|||
I support it | 53 | 91.38% | |
I oppose it | 5 | 8.62% | |
Total | 58 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
Pornography - are you for or against it and why?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)