RE: Question about "faith"
September 12, 2020 at 5:46 pm
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2020 at 5:48 pm by Angrboda.)
(September 12, 2020 at 4:15 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: The theory of ethics is named after the truth theory (or, in this case, anti-truth theory) which corresponds to it, and you most certainly asked about emotivism when you suggested that we may not have a way of knowing other than feeling like we know.
I suggested no such thing. You did. You asserted that something was true. That assertion implicitly contains the assertion that it can be false. You've been chasing strawmen from the word go. That doesn't really bother me much, but I will point out that any argument that depends on the refutation of a strawman is basically invalid.
(September 12, 2020 at 4:15 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: It's absurd, on it's face, to claim that knowing because we feel a certain way is equivalent to knowing because we engaged in a thorough investigation of the subject and after much consideration have arrived at an inescapable conclusion.
I haven't said this either.
Are you prepared to finally answer the question I asked, or am I going to have to suffer through several more posts filled with falsehoods, red herrings, and strawmen from you before I get an answer?