RE: Why does god put the needs of the few above the need of the many?
January 12, 2021 at 2:11 pm
(This post was last modified: January 12, 2021 at 2:30 pm by Drich.)
(January 8, 2021 at 5:42 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote:(January 7, 2021 at 4:15 pm)Drich Wrote: because the many in the parable already belong to god. they are saved/safe. the lost he leaves the 99 saved for would have never found their way back on their own, if he did not go out to meet them.
Sure, must have been that. Couldn't possibly have been that the people who imagined the character of their god in the story were few, and had needs and desires that ran contrary to what was good for many.
it was a parable of Christ where he stood with 5000 teaching this story. sooo there's that.
(January 12, 2021 at 2:10 pm)Angrboda Wrote: Children are not property.
then if i take one of your kids are you saying you have no recourse? after all if i take your car, you call the police and say my car is stolen or do you say nothing, because the car is notassigned to you no do you have any ownership rights?
like wise if i take your child do you do nothing? or do you call the police and say someone took MY (a possessive pronoun declaring ownership) https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/parts...onoun.html ) Kid? or because you hold no ownership you drop the matter?
if you seek or demand the child back it is because you are declaring ownership. If you child says @ 10 years old i want to move in with iron man, or want to run off with the circus does the circus now have ownership of said child? does the child get to choose guardianship? no you say? then the rest is a word game. the word ownership my not be used in conjunction with the word child, for bullshite political snow flake reasons. but in all rights and laws ownership is what binds a child to a parent. call it what you want but i can show ownership by act and definition which is all my original point implies.
