RE: forbidding people to love each other
June 30, 2021 at 7:26 pm
(This post was last modified: June 30, 2021 at 7:28 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:How else should one interpret you bringing up animals to a discussion about homosexuality?The statement was about homosexuality being unnatural. It clearly isn't because it's found in nature. No normative or prescriptive statement was attached to the statement.
Quote:If your morality revolves around imitating sheep, for example -and since male sheep sometimes ride male sheep, then I can see why homosexuality is not a problem for you. You shouldn't take that too personally, though, and decide to insult family... That's what being an atheist means: an animal. Your atheist friends here can kindly explain to you why you are animals, after all, just slightly higher on the evolutionary ladder.Except at no point did No argue for this or anything like this. As for the rest of your unhinged blather it;'s not even worth addressing because it has fuck all to do with anything.
If this was a display of your destructiveness colour me unimpressed
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM