RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
February 27, 2009 at 11:54 pm
(This post was last modified: February 27, 2009 at 11:54 pm by DD_8630.)
(February 25, 2009 at 5:23 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote:Well of course not! We're neither omnipotent, fully concious, nor individual particles. We can't expect to comprehend what such entities perceive (if they even exist).DD Wrote:By your definition, biological life is 'simple'. I don't think that's the kind of complexity people are talking about here.Huh?
Well the thing is it would be very unusual indeed for a particle to be omnipotent and fully conscious! I don't see how that is possible!
Naraoia;50836145 Wrote:Being fully conscious and omnipotent makes something very complex.That sounds like a definition of 'complexity'. Could you elaborate on this?
"I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right." - Stargate: SG1
A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone. - Charles Darwin
A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone. - Charles Darwin