Non-muslim terriorist kills 84 in Norway.

[Statler Waldorf]

I wouldn't try citing Wikipedia on anything, unless a client wants it.

At any rate, you did not act like you hated Wikipedia. You defended your use of it to me. That just shows you want to argue. You say now that you held the same opinion I do, yet you argued it at the time and are now arguing in opposition to that initial argument. Hmmm . . .

Actually, I went back and looked in the "Prayer" thread you are referring to, and I never cited Wikipedia there. I did use it in my “mysteries” thread but that was only because it was convenient and we were not having a debate. You can ask TheDarkestAngel, I have given him grief for using Wiki since I got on here, and I am still not a fan of it. It's a convenient source, but should never be used to try and demonstrate a point. Maybe we should just be glad we actually agree on something?

---

Stato, the " probably " merely acknowledges the minute possibility of god's existence. I think it is less arrogant than those who state categorically that god exists. Are you arrogant?

Knowing something to be true does not make someone arrogant. If I said, "I know that 2+2= 4" would you call me arrogant?