(November 29, 2011 at 3:34 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: Does anyone know what the fallacy of presenting the phenomena/place in question as "ontological proof" of any given supernatural being's existence is?
Like for example: "The Universe is proof of a God."
"The Forest is proof of Unicorns"
And so on...
Isn't that the argument from ignorance?
Trying to update my sig ...