At Some Point

[kılıç_mehmet]

And you responded with "Well I think abortion is..."

And what did I say about abortion itself?
I simply responded to the prospect of abortion being covered as a whole by the government.

We're not fucking discussing the ethics of abortion, we're discussing Republicans cutting funding to Texas' low-income family planning clinics.

And I said something that relates to the subject of ethnics of abortion?
I don't remember doing so.

Ergo, your statement is more likely to be a deflection-styled answer to the ethics of abortion when I'm not even talking about that.

Neither am I. Why are you so startled all the time?

Hence, 'obtuse fuck'.

Whatever.

Thumbing your nose at "what you could have posted" is no more threatening than the local preacher telling me I am "going to Hell".

Well, I could have posted something that surely would have derailed the thread.
You really are very very sensitive about this subject, as far as I understand.

[Autumnlicious]

And you responded with "Well I think abortion is..."

And what did I say about abortion itself?
I simply responded to the prospect of abortion being covered as a whole by the government.

Not in the scope of the discussion. Thank you for admitting you decided to go on a tangent about abortion, which was not what this article was about. It was about using the fear of 'ABORTION!' to cut programs that have little to nothing to do with.

And I said something that relates to the subject of ethnics of abortion?
I don't remember doing so.

You're right. It was an unsubstantiated opinion, as common as an asshole is, not a comment projected from an ethics standpoint. My mistake for ascribing something higher level to this sentence:
"Well, in my opinion, abortions are not ought to be paid for by the state, unless they are necessary in cases of life threatening pregnancies, or in which the baby is severely disabled/disfigured/mentally retarded."

And no comment to the psychobabble.

[renew]

I have always wondered why these programs do not offer tubal litigation or vasectomies to the public as an option. These procedures are on an out patient basis, and do not require too much time off of work.

Mammograms to me are a torture devise, to some woman they have been a life saver and caught the cancer early. With the fight against cancer as strong as it is, another will most likely step up to the plate and offer mammograms.

The pap smears well, hell they make every other OTC detection kit, I cannot see why they can't make one for this also.

It brings to mind is univeral health care a better option for the United States?

[Minimalist]

No, because then the republicunts could not use jesus to torment the poor.