Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 1:57 am
Thread Rating:
|
Evolution
|
 RE: Evolution
May 2, 2012 at 9:03 am
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2012 at 9:06 am by Epimethean.)
A certain someone failed to read the rather long article I linked-or read it and blanked it out. I think a lot of blanking out must occur for a christian to suggest that christianity is seminal to science.
Bad Abishalom. Your points were all addressed in that article-and dashed.
Trying to update my sig ...
 RE: Evolution
May 2, 2012 at 11:37 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2012 at 11:40 pm by Abishalom.)
(May 2, 2012 at 9:03 am)Epimethean Wrote: A certain someone failed to read the rather long article I linked-or read it and blanked it out. I think a lot of blanking out must occur for a christian to suggest that christianity is seminal to science. I actually read that article and they failed to address my point as you've claimed. You saying this article sufficiently is more like a case of appeal to consequence. Question for everyone...do you believe ones worldview affects scientific results? (May 2, 2012 at 12:47 am)genkaus Wrote:(May 2, 2012 at 12:16 am)Abishalom Wrote: I just asked you for your views of these subjects and this is your response (without even answering my question...tsk tsk)? Genkaus you gave me a generic definition of science and Christiany NOT your view on science vs Christianity. You also gave me a bland definition of the "dark ages" NOT your view on it. Just go ahead an carry the delusion.
You have received ample evidence, from many members, to suggest that your understanding of evolution, genetics, and science in general is not only skewed, but faulty and deluded due to your belief system, Abishalom. I think Minimalist will be the best guide for you now.
Trying to update my sig ...
RE: Evolution
May 3, 2012 at 7:45 am
(This post was last modified: May 3, 2012 at 7:46 am by The Grand Nudger.)
Any number of personal quirks might influence a researcher and effect "scientific results" This is a well known problem (with people, not science) and steps are taken to address it. Try a double blind.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
 (May 3, 2012 at 2:40 am)Epimethean Wrote: You have received ample evidence, from many members, to suggest that your understanding of evolution, genetics, and science in general is not only skewed, but faulty and deluded due to your belief system, Abishalom. I think Minimalist will be the best guide for you now. 'Nough said.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
