Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 24, 2024, 4:01 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What's not to love?
#31
RE: What's not to love?
(April 26, 2012 at 12:45 am)radorth Wrote: So it seems fair to say that if there is an afterlife, I will end up in the company of at least 50 American Founders, Newton, Bacon, Locke, the abolitionists who were virtually all "fundy" Christians, most if not all leaders of the Enlightenment and revivals which changed the world, Solenzenitzen and probably Mahatma Gandhi.

That's assuming they followed the "true" path of salvation as detailed in the Bible. According to many Christian understandings of salvation, Gandhi is roasting in Hell right now.

(April 26, 2012 at 12:45 am)radorth Wrote: And the more cynical unbelievers here will end up in the company of ...er...Minimalist, Deist Paladin and the Pharisees.

The atheists here sound in so many ways like the Phariees.

It ain't true. Don't believe anything Jesus says. He's a fake. He's crazy. He's not for real. You have to wonder how many atheists really know the difference between honest skepticism and mere cynicism.

The way you know and think of the Pharisees comes from the Gospels which many of us think are obviously almost entirely fiction.

"The atheists here sound in so many ways like Lex Luthor."

Facepalm
My ignore list




"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).
Reply
#32
RE: What's not to love?
Quote:The atheists here sound in so many ways like the Phariees.

So now we have established that you don't know shit about the pharisees, either. At least you are consistent.


Quote:The Pharisees

The most important of the three were the Pharisees because they are the spiritual fathers of modern Judaism. Their main distinguishing characteristic was a belief in an Oral Law that God gave to Moses at Sinai along with the Torah. The Torah or Written Law was akin to the U.S. Constitution in the sense that it set down a series of laws that were open to interpretation. The Pharisees believed that God also gave Moses the knowledge of what these laws meant and how they should be applied. This oral tradition was codified and written down roughly three centuries later in what is known as the Talmud.

The Pharisees also maintained that an afterlife existed and that God punished the wicked and rewarded the righteous in the world to come. They also believed in a messiah who would herald an era of world peace.

Pharisees were in a sense blue-collar Jews who adhered to the tenets developed after the destruction of the Temple; that is, such things as individual prayer and assembly in synagogues.

Whereas the Sadducees....

Quote:The Sadducees

The Sadducees were elitists who wanted to maintain the priestly caste, but they were also liberal in their willingness to incorporate Hellenism into their lives, something the Pharisees opposed. The Sadducees rejected the idea of the Oral Law and insisted on a literal interpretation of the Written Law; consequently, they did not believe in an afterlife, since it is not mentioned in the Torah. The main focus of Sadducee life was rituals associated with the Temple.

The Sadducees disappeared around 70 A.D., after the destruction of the Second Temple (see below). None of the writings of the Sadducees survived, so the little we know about them comes from their Pharisaic opponents.


Of course, by the time your silly-ass bullshit was written down the Sadducees no longer existed so idiot early xtians wrote the pharisees up to play the part of the Klingons.
Reply
#33
RE: What's not to love?
(April 25, 2012 at 8:32 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:I actually do like the golden rule,

Greeks came up with it first.

Thought as much. So far the bible has been far from original.. Big Grin

(April 26, 2012 at 12:45 am)radorth Wrote: And the more cynical unbelievers here will end up in the company of ...er...Minimalist, Deist Paladin, Dawkins [---]

If I'm wrong, and there is such a thing as afterlife, this is the company I would like to have. I don't see the problem here Big Grin

When I was young, there was a god with infinite power protecting me. Is there anyone else who felt that way? And was sure about it? but the first time I fell in love, I was thrown down - or maybe I broke free - and I bade farewell to God and became human. Now I don't have God's protection, and I walk on the ground without wings, but I don't regret this hardship. I want to live as a person. -Arina Tanemura

Reply
#34
RE: What's not to love?
(April 26, 2012 at 12:55 am)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: That's assuming they followed the "true" path of salvation as detailed in the Bible. According to many Christian understandings of salvation, Gandhi is roasting in Hell right now.

Glad you found something to pick on. I said "probably" for a reason. If Gandhi has decided Jesus is Lord by now and wants to serve him as such, I can't say he's "roasting" in hell. Of course one's flesh can't "roast" in hell as you put it, or there would soon be no more flesh. They can only pay the price of eternal "wailing and gnashing of teeth" signifying the realization of how foolish, cynical and shallow-hearted one was.

Quote:"The atheists here sound in so many ways like Lex Luthor."

Facepalm

Heh, perhaps you have a point
Reply
#35
RE: What's not to love?
Imagining what Ghandi"s ghost may or may not be doing are we? LOL, I have a couple of toddlers that have a firmer grasp of reality Rad.

Foolish, cynical, and shallow-hearted, probably not. I just don't like the kool-aid you're offering. Asshat.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#36
RE: What's not to love?
(April 26, 2012 at 2:15 am)Minimalist Wrote: The most important of the three were the Pharisees because they are the spiritual fathers of modern Judaism. Their main distinguishing characteristic was a belief in an Oral Law that God gave to Moses at Sinai along with the Torah. The Torah or Written Law was akin to the U.S. Constitution in the sense that it set down a series of laws that were open to interpretation. The Pharisees believed that God also gave Moses the knowledge of what these laws meant and how they should be applied. This oral tradition was codified and written down roughly three centuries later in what is known as the Talmud.

The Pharisees also maintained that an afterlife existed and that God punished the wicked and rewarded the righteous in the world to come. They also believed in a messiah who would herald an era of world peace.

Which has almost nothing to do with anything, but it appears you have no problem being in their company. You seem incredibly anxious to vindicate anyone who was opposed to Jesus, even though he didn't exist.

You should have a chat with tearlgrayshot. He isn't convinced the Pharisees existed, since the New Testament mentions them.

I'm having way too much fun with you guys. Big Grin


(April 26, 2012 at 9:29 am)Rhythm Wrote: Imagining what Ghandi"s ghost may or may not be doing are we? LOL, I have a couple of toddlers that have a firmer grasp of reality Rad.

Foolish, cynical, and shallow-hearted, probably not. I just don't like the kool-aid you're offering. Asshat.

No I'm just offering the rationale of John Locke. You know, the deist who we just learned was a fundy at heart? (According to your standards, not mine)

Reply
#37
RE: What's not to love?
What are my standards? John Locke is an authority on what? Since you want to make the appeal. His own opinions? Granted. Anything else?

(You're in the habit of presenting perceived authorities as shorthand for nebulous concepts which you are incapable of personally elaborating upon, aren't you? If so many others have said it better than yourself, and you are incapable of making a contribution to what has been said.................. )
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#38
RE: What's not to love?
deciple Wrote:Many people make the mistake of thinking christians follow jesus out of fear. We do not.
Back in the day I used to think the same way. Apparently we're both wrong.



radorth Wrote:
FallentoReason Wrote:I don't believe not because it doesn't appeal to me or because I don't 'love' something in it. It's because as a free thinker I can't honestly say I believe it and keep a straight face. There's flaws that stop me from rationally being able to believe in Jesus.
"Free thinker" rarely equals rational. "False in one part, so false in all" is a logical fallacy. Jefferson understood this when he praised Jesus so highly while saying the miracles must have been made up. That IMO is the mark of a freethinker, if a picky one. He throws out what he thinks is bathwater, but keeps the Baby
Sorry for the late reply. Didn't see this.

From wikipedia:
Freethought is a philosophical viewpoint that holds opinions should be formed on the basis of science, logic, and reason, and should not be influenced by authority, tradition, or other dogmas. The cognitive application of freethought is known as "freethinking," and practitioners of freethought are known as "freethinkers."

So as I said, I can't believe in Jesus because the NT is flawed in many ways and misleading in others. One example is the Church tradition that gave the names to the Gospels. I don't have anything that logically shows me they (Mark, Matthew, Luke and John) in fact wrote those manuscripts therefore I cannot begin to believe in Jesus because there's no reason to think I'm reading the words of witnesses.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
Reply
#39
RE: What's not to love?
(April 26, 2012 at 9:33 am)radorth Wrote: ...

You should have a chat with tearlgrayshot. He isn't convinced the Pharisees existed, since the New Testament mentions them.

....

No, no, no, no, that's not what I believe. The Pharisees probably existed, but I very much doubt they said the things they said in the Gospels.
My ignore list




"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).
Reply
#40
RE: What's not to love?
Quote:Which has almost nothing to do with anything, but it appears you have no problem being in their company.


READ IT, Stupid. Your fucking "jesus" would have been a pharisee!!

Quote:The Pharisees also maintained that an afterlife existed and that God punished the wicked and rewarded the righteous in the world to come. They also believed in a messiah who would herald an era of world peace.

How fucking dumb are you? This is the core of your silly-assed belief system.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  God does not love you... Drich 132 51298 May 12, 2012 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Epimethean
  God cannot love or be Love. Greatest I am 0 1399 December 30, 2011 at 12:49 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  A and E could not know love without eating of the TOK. Greatest I am 8 3448 September 2, 2011 at 2:50 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)