atheists and "conspiracy" theories

[jackman]

i see where you're going with that.

[Christi]

So the White House is protected, but the Pentagon is not?

I just don't understand the reasoning. The White House would have the same protection as the Pentagon. To say that planes could crash into the WTC and Pentagon but somehow not the White House doesn't make sense. You reason that the Air Force cannot be responsible for Domestic Flights yet somehow they are for certain buildings, but just not a building like the Pentagon. For Real?

Obviously, we have no idea on the towers, but WTC7 and the fact that the Air Force was too busy with other things just cannot be explained. Deny it all you want, because it really doesn't matter. Nothing will ever be done about it, and most have already moved on. Obviously, there is a lot that we don't know. You can accept that or be in denial. Either way, it's not going to matter. Yes, I am done repeating myself and done with this conversation. People are starting to argue just for the sake of arguing and aren't making much sense.

[Tiberius]

Obviously, we have no idea on the towers, but WTC7 and the fact that the Air Force was too busy with other things just cannot be explained.

Yes they can, and they have been explained multiple times by various engineers, scientists, and officials. WTC7 collapsed because it got hit by debris (seriously, there is film of this happening) as the towers collapsed, caught fire, and was left to burn, collapsing again for the same reasons as the towers. The Air Force being busy was due to them practicing war games over Alaska (I think, don't quote me on that), and then getting confused when orders come in that an attack is happening (because in a war game, that is what you are practicing for).

To put it in real life terms, at the place where I work, the fire alarm goes off at 10am on Tuesdays as a test. We ignore it, since it's a test. What happened on 9/11 would be like a fire breaking out at work at 10am on a Tuesday. Confusion at first, but resolving itself sooner or later. On 9/11, the jets that were scrambled got confused over whether it was a drill or not, and then were given the wrong flights to track down. Terrorists, luck, and human error are responsible for 9/11, nothing else.

[Jaysyn]

So the White House is protected, but the Pentagon is not?

Only if you don't consider surface to air missile batteries protection.

[unbelievingatheist]

Thank Atheism that Jackman isn't toting the line! I think many of these topics are worthy of good debate. I personally find it quite disturbing that more people DON'T believe that 911 was an inside job, for instance.

Ever read 'Project For A New American Century'?

[Napoléon]

I personally find it quite disturbing that more people DON'T believe that 911 was an inside job, for instance.

Forgive us heathens who actually pay attention to evidence and fact.

[unbelievingatheist]

I am also very aware of RFID technology, and where it appears to be headed. I find this an even more *fascinating* topic, simply because we are looking at it from the angle of something that has not taken place, as opposed to looking backwards with speculation.

How's about we dive deeper into this 'conspiracy theory?' Please remember, this is a forum dedicated to 'freethinkers.'

[Napoléon]

Please remember, this is a forum dedicated to 'freethinkers.'

Dude you sound like a fucking preacher get a load of yourself really.

[unbelievingatheist]

Bring on some evidence, Napoleon!

Be aware, you can speak volumes for any club you align yourself with.

I'll treat you with respect, hopefully you'll return the favor. No condescinding with my coffee, please.

[Napoléon]

Bring on some evidence, Napoleon!

There's a multitude of evidence in this thread. Can you not read?

How about you present your best evidence that 911 was an inside job, seen as you are the one making the claim.

Burden of proof is on you.