Atheists are Intolerant

[DeeTee]

If anything, there are fewer risks with unprotected homosexual sex, especially in ancient times. Homosexual sex cannot lead to pregnancy, and pregnancy can be dangerous, even more so in biblical times.

Just to clarify for argument's sake. You are saying that pregnancy is far more dangeous than HIV or AIDS?
------------------------------------------

In the news stories you're speaking of, it is not just a relgious activity (like praying) in a public place (like a church), it's a physical display on government property, which creates an unnecessary entanglement of government and religion.

You are wrong, very wrong. it was a GIFT from a GRADUATING class to their SCHOOL> Government (state and federal) had no part in the matter. You are reading into this far too much.

There was NO violation of the supposed establishment claus.

It's not only atheists that contend these practices

Then why is it ONLY atheists who are bringing these lawsuits?

Just because we don't read the establishment clause the same way you do, doesn't mean your reading is the correct one. Mere assertion and dismissed as such.

As is yours. You have nothing to make your reading greater than anyone else's. Yours is based upon your unbelief and that is not enough.

It's not the offense. It's the principle, and the law

Wrong. itis the offense, you just use the principle and the law as an excuse to force out information you do not like. Atheists are very intolerant and spoiled little babies.

American law starts with the Constitution, but does not end with it

Then the constitution is of no value and needs to be struck down, replaced by subjective opinion reliant upon the whims of those who are in power. All you are advocating is anarchy.

We're going to be the majority of the public one day

Yes you will and you will have no MORAL fiber or standard to guide your actions. Then you will see how dangerous atheism is and how wrong you are.

Religous freedom is not the entitlement to government endorsement

IF there is such a thing as religious freedom, it must apply to all even governments or there is no such thing as religious freedom./

Tolerance doesn't include not exposing you to our opinions

If you merely expressed your opinions then there would be NO problems BUT atheists do not. They go to the courts and FORCE their opinions on others. (or try to force).

If we want to take this a step further, you will notice that their is NO constitutional right to atheism. Read it without doing any eisegetical work and you will see your unbelief is unconstitutional.

---

P.S. Atheists claim that atheism is not a belief or a religion thus it is SOL.

[The Heff]

[Annik]

Hey, DT, your ignorance is showing. How embarrassing.

[genkaus]

[Tobie]

Just to clarify for argument's sake. You are saying that pregnancy is far more dangeous than HIV or AIDS?

No I am not. HIV and AIDS are equally likely to be spread by homosexuality and heterosexuality, and I said that heterosexual sex can have pregnancy as well.

[The Heff]

No I am not. HIV and AIDS are equally likely to be spread by homosexuality and heterosexuality, and I said that heterosexual sex can have pregnancy as well.

In fact, in the case of a spread of the disease in heterosexual couples the child is nearly always afflicted by the disease as well, meaning the unintended suffering of at least a third person.

[genkaus]

Just to clarify for argument's sake. You are saying that pregnancy is far more dangeous than HIV or AIDS?

It is the leading cause of death for women. Greater than HIV.

You are wrong, very wrong. it was a GIFT from a GRADUATING class to their SCHOOL> Government (state and federal) had no part in the matter. You are reading into this far too much.

There was NO violation of the supposed establishment claus.

The establishment clause was violated the moment they chose to display that gift in the public forum.

Then why is it ONLY atheists who are bringing these lawsuits?

Because, unlike Christians, we don't break the law first and then ask for permission.

Yes you will and you will have no MORAL fiber or standard to guide your actions. Then you will see how dangerous atheism is and how wrong you are.

As opposed to the fine moral fiber of raping, pillaging, murdering Christians that led us into the dark ages?

[ElDinero]

Ok guys, I'm all caught up. So we've established Abishalom is a thick headed cunt incapable of answering a question about his views in a forthright manner because the answer makes him look like a bigot. He continually dodges the issue and in doing so betrays his own prejudices and makes clear his own position. Have I missed anything out?

I find it so much easier being a person with a moral compass, makes questions like this decidedly simple to answer.

[Abishalom]

Ok guys, I'm all caught up. So we've established Abishalom is a thick headed cunt incapable of answering a question about his views in a forthright manner because the answer makes him look like a bigot. He continually dodges the issue and in doing so betrays his own prejudices and makes clear his own position. Have I missed anything out?

I find it so much easier being a person with a moral compass, makes questions like this decidedly simple to answer.

Somebody's riding their high horse. Well glad you have a "moral compass". Anyway, I already said I do not condone homosexuality. That's my view. You're just being a tool. You begged me to answer your little hypothetical yet highly unrealistic scenario. How about this...let's do a survey...how many homosexual males get caught in the act by 2 or more people. I'm willing to say it almost never happens. I never dodged your question, you're just being unrealistic and in a sense you're no less the bigot you accuse me of being. So get over it.

[Napoléon]

I think it's about time we used the troll spray on Abishalom