There's no nicer way to say this but...

[Annik]

Your religion should not interfere with law. You have a pretty thick skull, but maybe this will get through: Your religion should have no say in anyone's life but your own. Your bigotry has no place being law. Your prejudice is disgusting and you should try to develop some empathy towards your fellow man.

[Jackalope]

Your religion should not interfere with law. You have a pretty thick skull, but maybe this will get through: Your religion should have no say in anyone's life but your own. Your bigotry has no place being law. Your prejudice is disgusting and you should try to develop some empathy towards your fellow man.

Now, Annik, I'm sure he has plenty of empathy for those that share his beliefs.

It's just the rest of us that he applies the broad brush of prejudice against.

Is that so wrong?

[Annik]

Found this, made me smile:

[Minimalist]

The fact that this is still an issue is ridiculous, thank the bible thumpers for swearing by how America was based on Christian values. Pfft.

Perhaps they have a point. Bigotry and hatred are clearly xtian "values."

[DeeTee]

To reply to Annik--No but GOD did and does.

Bigotry and hatred are clearly xtian "values

No, it is called democracy in action. Democracy applies to all and to be exercised by all. Have you noticed how the homosexual community, every time it doesn't get its spoiled way, circumvents the democratic process in order to force their desire son those who have democratically rejected their proposals?

Your anger should be directed at them for undermining freedom and democracy.

[Annik]

Yeah, they just keep getting so upset over being persecuted against. Why can't they just be happy as sub-humans?

[Kayenneh]

Why should their sin be legitimized?

There's no such thing as sin, it's just a childish notion for arrogant/intolerant/scared people.

Nothing good comes from a union beteen homosexuals, why let it continue?

Really? You're truly that narrow minded? I could as easily change your sentence, take out 'homosexuals' and replace it with Christians, and I would be as wrong as you are now. Absolutes are indeed the mark of a true bigot..

How is allowing gay marriage for the better?

How about making thousands of people happy that they are an accepted part of the community and have equal rights and status as human beings?

You are just like the California homosexual community. You and they are only happy and support democracy when its results are in your favor but when it goes against you then it is ridiculous, wrong, and influenced by religion.

Religion and politics should have nothing to do with each other. I'd like to see how you would react to "democracy" under a say, muslim government..

You forget that people have free choice and they are allowed to freely choose against same sex marriage.

Nope, we do not. No one is forcing you to marry a gay man

---

EDIT: Or if I'm wrong and you were forced into a gay marriage, then I understand your frustration, and then I think you definitely have a say in the matter

---

[kılıç_mehmet]

FUCK NORTH CAROLINA!!!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/08...lp00000009

North Carolina voters approved a constitutional amendment on Tuesday defining marriage solely as a union between a man and a woman, making it the 30th state to adopt such a ban.

I applaud this brave move.
It was time someone spoke the millenia old truth.

---

Found this, made me smile:

I can tell you this much: the concept of marriage according to judeo-christian values has a similar value in the vast Turkish traditions across eurasia, even amongst our brethren who worship pagan or dharmic faiths.
Even the majority of the atheists here would not be content with marriage being open to all kinds of "sexualities".

[LastPoet]

I'm glad that in my country, despite being not a very 'developed' one, we have gay marriage legal. Bear in mind that the state doesn't force churches to perform gay marriages(mainly catholics here and we all know what the fucktards think about this), its about marriyng by the state, so they could have the same legal protections Hetero couples already had. Its been 2 years now and I don't see any problem arising from it, the world hasn't ended, people are not 'changing' en masse to become homossexual(like the so often claim), nor apocalipse came.

Its funny, really that the so called christian love™ is such a limited proposition.

And DeeTee, just for you:

To bring about the rule of righteousness in the land, so that the strong should not harm the weak.

Way older than your wholly babble, and a small step ahead of your barbaric religious ideology.

[Faith No More]

Your anger should be directed at them for undermining freedom and democracy.

The U.S. is not simply a democracy. It is a democratic republic. The distinction being that a democratic republic is supposed to protect minority groups from the tyranny of the majority. It is you and those that think like you that undermine freedom.