Posts: 8781
Threads: 26
Joined: March 15, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: Science + Creation
June 20, 2012 at 12:58 pm
(June 20, 2012 at 5:36 am)Zen Badger Wrote: (June 20, 2012 at 12:00 am)Godschild Wrote: The long age big-bang idea has a problem of it's own with light-travel-time. Seems there are points in the distant universe which are today all the same temperature, yet they are so far apart that there has not been anywhere near enough time for energy travelling at the speed of light to cross that distance to equilibrate the temperature. Even with the billions of years the big-bang model shows, the big-bang model needs billions of more years than that. :Carl Wieland
So if the speed of light which is the speed limit of the universe is a problem with the big-bang, why do you allow for the big-bang and yet dismiss creation for the same reason.
You have absolutely no fucking idea what you're talking about, do you...
Imagine two kettles on opposite sides of the Earth. When they reach 100 deg they are going to be at the same temperature and they don't need to be in communication with each other to do that.
Do try to learn some real science instead of spouting the inane drivel that the cretinists vomit up.
You are trying to push the facts aside with your own drivel, typical of those who do not like there little notions attacked.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Posts: 4234
Threads: 42
Joined: June 7, 2011
Reputation:
33
RE: Science + Creation
June 20, 2012 at 12:59 pm
Sources, GC. Send 'em and we'll evaluate what you are trying to say.
Trying to update my sig ...
Posts: 4234
Threads: 42
Joined: June 7, 2011
Reputation:
33
RE: Science + Creation
June 20, 2012 at 1:08 pm
The flat universe problem.
Trying to update my sig ...
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Science + Creation
June 20, 2012 at 1:10 pm
(This post was last modified: June 20, 2012 at 1:16 pm by Anomalocaris.)
Yes. Not a problem if one does not try to impose some Newtonian sensibilities upon a relativistic universe.
Posts: 8781
Threads: 26
Joined: March 15, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: Science + Creation
June 21, 2012 at 12:21 am
(June 20, 2012 at 12:59 pm)Epimethean Wrote: Sources, GC. Send 'em and we'll evaluate what you are trying to say.
I gave a source, go read.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Posts: 1497
Threads: 29
Joined: February 16, 2010
Reputation:
23
RE: Science + Creation
June 21, 2012 at 1:47 pm
(June 21, 2012 at 1:43 pm)apophenia Wrote: By not warning their readers, they are effectively lying to them.
Golly, gee! You mean that Creationist organizations will misrepresent science?
Well, butter my ass and call me a biscuit! Who'd a thunk?
Science flies us to the moon and stars. Religion flies us into buildings.
God allowed 200,000 people to die in an earthquake. So what makes you think he cares about YOUR problems?
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrp...pouidnfvtl]](https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/scl/fi/a6a72vica8gsyddmkhtxp/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrpk9dzrupouidnfvtl)
![[Image: go-on-the-internet-and-tell-lies.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=anongallery.org%2Fimg%2F4%2F8%2Fgo-on-the-internet-and-tell-lies.jpg)
