Understanding the Burden of Proof

[FemmeRealism]

THE BURDEN OF PROOF (as I see it)

____f____(-c)|0|(+c)____k____

Let k=knowledge or something you know as fact and f=faith or something you believe and c=contingent or subject to chance

k=(+1) f=(-1)

k is absolute (+) while f is contingent (-)

B=Burden of Proof

f(-c)(+B)<k(+c)(-B)

Thusly if your belief is contingent (not absolute) the you (+B) bear the Burden of Proof.
If you do not believe/your belief is absolute then you (-B) do not bear the Burden of Proof.

Math makes everything easier.

[Mister Agenda]

That's exactly what I was saying, translated into mathese! Thanks, Femme (if I may call you Femme).

[FemmeRealism]

I'm pretty sure mathese is my secondary language. And call me whatever you want. (:

[CliveStaples]

THE BURDEN OF PROOF (as I see it)

____f____(-c)|0|(+c)____k____

Let k=knowledge or something you know as fact and f=faith or something you believe and c=contingent or subject to chance

k=(+1) f=(-1)

k is absolute (+) while f is contingent (-)

B=Burden of Proof

f(-c)(+B)<k(+c)(-B)

Thusly if your belief is contingent (not absolute) the you (+B) bear the Burden of Proof.
If you do not believe/your belief is absolute then you (-B) do not bear the Burden of Proof.

Math makes everything easier.

Almost none of this makes sense.

What is the expression "f(-c)(+B)"? Are the terms being multiplied together?

[FemmeRealism]

Faith is contingent and therefore bears the burden of proof.
I should have said (f[-c])(+B) to make it clearer.