Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 21, 2024, 8:04 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
North Korea Aiming Nuclear Test Towards US
#21
RE: North Korea Aiming Nuclear Test Towards US
I'm in the mood to watch The Dictator now.



Reply
#22
RE: North Korea Aiming Nuclear Test Towards US
(January 25, 2013 at 7:55 am)Waratah Wrote: Not very secretive if they keep telling everyone what they are doing. Smile

They just want attention, look away and focus on Swedish women I say!
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan

Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.

Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.

You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Reply
#23
RE: North Korea Aiming Nuclear Test Towards US
(January 25, 2013 at 8:21 am)Insanity x Wrote: Kim Jong-un is not amused.

[Image: c6278b5096bbf978d1cd6f370ed4c335.jpg]

He would look more despotic if the menacing downward turn of the corners of his mouth didn't scrunch so pouty a set of fat red lips.
Reply
#24
RE: North Korea Aiming Nuclear Test Towards US
Aren`t they angry because their only friends left who matter (China and Russia) voted in aproval for a UN resolution condeming the previous missile test, a potential future missile test, a potential future nuke test and approved of further sanctions as reaction to the previous missile test.


China seems to be getting annoyed with it`s neighbour, especialy since they are more and more interested in regional stability than in some fat kids infiriority complex and how he deals with it.
Reply
#25
RE: North Korea Aiming Nuclear Test Towards US
The Chinese generally tend to be more accommodating to American interests at the start of a new administration so as to start on the right foot. The Chinese didn't much like Hillary Clinton, Obama's pivot towards Asia, or the what they perceive to the targeted subversion of regimes in Asia nnd Africa friendly to Chinese interests. They hope the incoming secretaries of state and defence will push for a more traditional and Atlanticist policy. Also they are probably concerned not to push the US to side further with Japan on the armed standoff at Senkaku Islands.
Reply
#26
RE: North Korea Aiming Nuclear Test Towards US
Many 13 year olds play guns, this is why you don't let them run countries.

Still, aiming a rocket at the United States is one very quick way of destroying Capitalism..
Reply
#27
RE: North Korea Aiming Nuclear Test Towards US
(January 25, 2013 at 7:03 pm)HorribleOffensiveScouser91 Wrote: Many 13 year olds play guns, this is why you don't let them run countries.

Still, aiming a rocket at the United States is one very quick way of destroying Capitalism..

It would take a lot more than 1.
Reply
#28
RE: North Korea Aiming Nuclear Test Towards US
The actual evil plot is that by pointing missiles at the US, Kim Jong Un will destroy capitalism by forcing a scale up of the corporatism-friendly military-industrial complex.

Mwuahahahaha
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
#29
RE: North Korea Aiming Nuclear Test Towards US
Really whether it fails or not should not mitigate worry over the fact that they may start dangerous tests. Fails could mean it drops on a nearby country or even on North Korea. A nuke landing anywhere is a tragedy. Then again, we can't afford another war. Two of my grandfathers (yes, I had three) fought those assholes before. I don't want their grandkids and great-grandkids to do it again. Let some other country concern themselves with North Korea. Someone eventually will.
Reply
#30
RE: North Korea Aiming Nuclear Test Towards US
(January 25, 2013 at 7:34 pm)Shell B Wrote: Really whether it fails or not should not mitigate worry over the fact that they may start dangerous tests. Fails could mean it drops on a nearby country or even on North Korea. A nuke landing anywhere is a tragedy. Then again, we can't afford another war. Two of my grandfathers (yes, I had three) fought those assholes before. I don't want their grandkids and great-grandkids to do it again. Let some other country concern themselves with North Korea. Someone eventually will.

What worries me is that North Korea seems almost completely irrational and unpredictable. It seemed after Kim Jong-il's death that NK was becoming more reasonable but this seems to show that instead they have become more likely to do something stupid.

I wouldn't be surprised if NK would attack SK with a nuclear weapon just as a power trip of some kind. But who knows what they really want.. I'm glad however that China is supporting sanctions.

Oh and I had 3 grandads too. None of them fought anyone tho :/
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  North Sea oil LinuxGal 7 802 September 4, 2023 at 7:05 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  America. Worse than North Korea. deepend 195 12176 March 26, 2022 at 2:05 pm
Last Post: TaraJo
  Donald Trump and Melania test positive for Coronavirus zebo-the-fat 42 4078 October 4, 2020 at 6:19 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Nuclear War must become obsolete OP/ED Brian37 43 3982 March 23, 2018 at 4:45 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Is North Korea just insane? Renug 6 1646 May 29, 2017 at 8:26 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  What is up with the disdain Republicans have towards educational institutes? NuclearEnergy 35 3981 April 20, 2017 at 11:50 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  America drops "largest non-nuclear bomb in history" on Afganistan Aroura 77 14680 April 17, 2017 at 3:19 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  The Great Divide and Apathy Towards Politics AceBoogie 13 2604 April 8, 2017 at 9:59 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  North Korea executed 5 security officials, South Korea says KUSA 32 6055 March 2, 2017 at 7:16 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Trump put call with Putin on hold to ask his aides to explain our nuclear arms treaty Aegon 43 8015 February 14, 2017 at 10:34 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)