Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 14, 2024, 3:03 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New Video on Apologetics
#41
RE: New Video on Apologetics
(February 4, 2013 at 10:58 pm)Baalzebutt Wrote:
(February 4, 2013 at 10:51 pm)catfish Wrote: Burden of proof is on you, right?
.

See previous post.

You know what? I owe you an apology. I did not intent to devolve into name calling. I know nothing about you beyond what I have read on the forum. I disagree with your viewpoint. That does not give me permission to call you names.

Please accept my apology and understand that I do respect your opinions, I just don't agree with them.

Cool man, forgiven. I appologise too, because I am a dick and I know it...
I'm a judgemental bastard too.
.

^^^^^^^^^^
Keep that for easy "proof" in case I ask for it again... lol
.
Reply
#42
RE: New Video on Apologetics
(February 4, 2013 at 11:11 pm)catfish Wrote:
(February 4, 2013 at 10:58 pm)Baalzebutt Wrote: See previous post.

You know what? I owe you an apology. I did not intent to devolve into name calling. I know nothing about you beyond what I have read on the forum. I disagree with your viewpoint. That does not give me permission to call you names.

Please accept my apology and understand that I do respect your opinions, I just don't agree with them.

Cool man, forgiven. I appologise too, because I am a dick and I know it...
I'm a judgemental bastard too.
.

::fistbump::
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." -Einstein
Reply
#43
RE: New Video on Apologetics
(February 4, 2013 at 11:03 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Mhmm, you keep an open mind, that's right. But you can't base your worldview on the possibility of things existing. Never be afraid to change your views to fit reality, but always make sure your views do fit reality as it is currently known.

My worldview isn't asserting that unicorns exist. My worldview is simply not denying the possibility.
.
Reply
#44
RE: New Video on Apologetics
(February 4, 2013 at 11:16 pm)catfish Wrote:
(February 4, 2013 at 11:03 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Mhmm, you keep an open mind, that's right. But you can't base your worldview on the possibility of things existing. Never be afraid to change your views to fit reality, but always make sure your views do fit reality as it is currently known.

My worldview isn't asserting that unicorns exist. My worldview is simply not denying the possibility.
.

Then you are a unicorn atheist.

This is EXACTLY the atheist stand on god. We assert that we do not believe god exists but we do not deny the possibility.

There is a possibility that anything you can imagine is possible.The problem here is that possibility and likelihood are two very different things. All current evidence point to the likelihood that neither god nor unicorns exist. However, that does not mean their existence is not possible.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." -Einstein
Reply
#45
RE: New Video on Apologetics
I'm not saying that I believe unicorns never existed, that's where you misunderstand my position. If anything, I'd be a unicorn agnostic. My problem is that I don't think a unicorn deserves myth status. I think it's highly probable that a one-horned beast existed.
.
Reply
#46
RE: New Video on Apologetics
(February 4, 2013 at 11:49 pm)catfish Wrote: I think it's highly probable that a one-horned beast existed.
.

Sounds like a porn star.
Reply
#47
RE: New Video on Apologetics
Eh, me so horny...
.
Reply
#48
RE: New Video on Apologetics
Thats going in the pun thread Tongue
Reply
#49
RE: New Video on Apologetics
(February 4, 2013 at 11:49 pm)catfish Wrote: I'm not saying that I believe unicorns never existed, that's where you misunderstand my position. If anything, I'd be a unicorn agnostic. My problem is that I don't think a unicorn deserves myth status. I think it's highly probable that a one-horned beast existed.
.

Well then we have a problem with definition because a one horned beast is not necessarily a unicorn. For instance, we have one horned beasts in the wild and in our zoos. We call them rhinoceri.

So let's first define unicorn and then we can talk about the possibility of it having existed.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." -Einstein
Reply
#50
RE: New Video on Apologetics
A rhino has 2 horns, does it not?
I had said earlier "species of some horse or predecessor".
Would you allow perhaps a deer or mule to fit that discription too?
.

Nevermind, 2 species do have one...
.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  If "god" wants to talk to me... [new video] robvalue 55 10156 February 23, 2017 at 12:38 pm
Last Post: Drich
Video New video: space, time and anger robvalue 15 3337 March 6, 2016 at 5:07 am
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  Pre-Suppositional Christian Apologetics SpecUVdust 11 3027 November 14, 2015 at 2:33 pm
Last Post: SpecUVdust
  Apologetics open challenge robvalue 172 46078 October 3, 2015 at 11:23 am
Last Post: Mystic
  apologetics website Nightfoot92 17 5761 November 23, 2013 at 7:34 am
Last Post: Esquilax
  Zeus apologetics Lemonvariable72 33 6569 November 5, 2013 at 4:19 am
Last Post: genkaus
Shocked Mormon Apologetics Tea Earl Grey Hot 6 3828 September 23, 2012 at 2:35 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  New Heaven and Earth (video) bjhulk 9 4750 February 8, 2011 at 4:11 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  The inherent sleaze of apologetics DeistPaladin 11 5221 January 20, 2011 at 5:31 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)