Exactly, repitious posts...and yet no matter how many times I repeat myself...you can't grasp it :S
I'm just speaking of any valid evidence of any form. You say there can be no evidence...but guess what?
You've changed your mind again. Now you're saying once again, that JP presented some. Presented what? Presented evidence when you've said time and time again that there can't be any!
And no, as I've said many times. JP has presented no valid evidence...his points start off and then he goes from A and B to X, Y and Z. How does he conclude that God is omnibenevolent and not omnimalevolent? Does he explain that? No. Have I asked him several times? Yes. Did he address it? No.
If God=whatever existed when time wasn't, therefore non-temporal because he's seprate to time..then how's that God untill you evidence more than just that? The other additions like, omnipresence, omniscience and...omnibenevolence! He doesn't fucking explain at all. And the non-temporal is just a premise because it's obvious if it's the case that at some point time didn't exist!
No evidence from JP...so I guess you're on my side there eh? Because you say there can be no evidence! And yet JP was claiming evidence!
But no, because you keep contradicting yourself, you're quite happy with his evidnece despite the fact you apparently don't want evidence!
EvF
I'm just speaking of any valid evidence of any form. You say there can be no evidence...but guess what?
You've changed your mind again. Now you're saying once again, that JP presented some. Presented what? Presented evidence when you've said time and time again that there can't be any!
And no, as I've said many times. JP has presented no valid evidence...his points start off and then he goes from A and B to X, Y and Z. How does he conclude that God is omnibenevolent and not omnimalevolent? Does he explain that? No. Have I asked him several times? Yes. Did he address it? No.
If God=whatever existed when time wasn't, therefore non-temporal because he's seprate to time..then how's that God untill you evidence more than just that? The other additions like, omnipresence, omniscience and...omnibenevolence! He doesn't fucking explain at all. And the non-temporal is just a premise because it's obvious if it's the case that at some point time didn't exist!
No evidence from JP...so I guess you're on my side there eh? Because you say there can be no evidence! And yet JP was claiming evidence!
But no, because you keep contradicting yourself, you're quite happy with his evidnece despite the fact you apparently don't want evidence!
EvF
