Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation:
145
RE: Agressive?
February 13, 2013 at 4:23 pm
(This post was last modified: February 13, 2013 at 4:24 pm by Violet.)
(February 13, 2013 at 11:31 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Can't explain anything in a way that anyone can tell is true or not. To be fair, it can explain ANYTHING to the same degree that any other made-up and unfalsifiable answer to a question can. Non-material electron fairies are the secret cause of voltage is as plausible as any other dualistic claim. There's no way of knowing which dualistic explanation for something, if any, is right.
There's no way to tell if anything materialistic is true or not. <insert solipsism> Regardless, it will come to a conclusion by its own rules, and the only truth to it is in following its own rules to its own conclusion.
Yes, such are plausible. Do you have a problem with the universe which even materialism cannot know without faith?
Quote:I should have said 'dualism can't explain anything usefully'.
Perhaps not to you, but if it changes anything: it's useful to someone.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
Re: RE: Agressive?
February 13, 2013 at 5:33 pm
(February 13, 2013 at 3:36 am)apophenia Wrote: I ridicule you for exactly what you believe fr0d0 (see the free will paradox thread). Don't go pretending you can get a pass by acting all meek and liberal and shit. You are the crazy, if only slightly less crazy than those other crazies. Being "relatively" sane doesn't make you sane.
And there was me thinking you were just full of philosophical tosh. Let me read it again...
No it's philosophical tosh alright
Posts: 28330
Threads: 114
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Agressive?
February 13, 2013 at 5:47 pm
(This post was last modified: February 13, 2013 at 6:04 pm by Angrboda.)
(February 13, 2013 at 5:33 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: (February 13, 2013 at 3:36 am)apophenia Wrote: I ridicule you for exactly what you believe fr0d0 (see the free will paradox thread). Don't go pretending you can get a pass by acting all meek and liberal and shit. You are the crazy, if only slightly less crazy than those other crazies. Being "relatively" sane doesn't make you sane. And there was me thinking you were just full of philosophical tosh. Let me read it again...
No it's philosophical tosh alright
Philosophical tosh that you've had three days to think up a cogent response to, and yet we see nothing.
I guess this is just more of your patented "evasive bullshit tosh."
(Shall I bring up the fact that in a recent thread, you forgot the context set by a post a mere 3 hours earlier? Naw. Best not to mention it. It was such an anomaly for a deep thinker like you. It doesn't merit revisiting.)
Posts: 2911
Threads: 11
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
16
RE: Agressive?
February 13, 2013 at 6:27 pm
I prefer the term "fluff", it covers sooo much more ground...
.
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
Re: RE: Agressive?
February 13, 2013 at 8:04 pm
(February 13, 2013 at 5:47 pm)apophenia Wrote: Philosophical tosh that you've had three days to think up a cogent response to, and yet we see nothing. Tosh requires no response.
(February 13, 2013 at 5:47 pm)apophenia Wrote: ( Shall I bring up the fact that in a recent thread, you forgot the context set by a post a mere 3 hours earlier? Mistakes aren't tosh, they're mistakes.
Posts: 28330
Threads: 114
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Agressive?
February 13, 2013 at 9:58 pm
(This post was last modified: February 13, 2013 at 10:00 pm by Angrboda.)
(February 13, 2013 at 8:04 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: (February 13, 2013 at 5:47 pm)apophenia Wrote: Philosophical tosh that you've had three days to think up a cogent response to, and yet we see nothing. Tosh requires no response.
According to urban dictionary, tosh has something to do with a guy's nutsack. How charming of you to imply that I tea bagged you but a) I'm a girl, and b) I wouldn't let you anywhere near my crotch.
Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation:
145
RE: Agressive?
February 13, 2013 at 11:58 pm
(February 13, 2013 at 9:58 pm)apophenia Wrote: According to urban dictionary, tosh has something to do with a guy's nutsack. How charming of you to imply that I tea bagged you but a) I'm a girl, and b) I wouldn't let you anywhere near my crotch.
Tosh is informal british english for 'nonsense' or 'rubbish'.
Farce dictionaries, and all that... y'know?
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
Re: Agressive?
February 14, 2013 at 4:28 am
I like your posts ap. I guess I rag on you because your position on religion seems at odds with the rest.
|
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
