Are depressed people more realistic?

[Creed of Heresy]

Junkyardboy, you're quickly earning your name because all your posts sound like trash.

Seriously, do you just speak exclusively in non-sequiturs?

[junkyardboy]

Junkyardboy, you're quickly earning your name because all your posts sound like trash.

Seriously, do you just speak exclusively in non-sequiturs?

seriously, i thought this was about realism
world war is like an earthquake in california...overdue

[Something completely different]

seriously, i thought this was about realism
world war is like an earthquake in california...overdue

if you start preaching about WW3 coming and how there needs to be jugdement via catastrophies and war and stuff.....

then I hope one of the mods will simply shut you the fuck up.



cause that is the thing which really is long overdue

[Creed of Heresy]

seriously, i thought this was about realism
world war is like an earthquake in california...overdue

Sorry to break your delusion and hopes for satisfying that mass-death fetish you religious types just get rock-hard over but the world seems to be operating under the idea that destroying itself is NOT a good idea. When even North Korea only blusters about using nuclear weapons yet clearly has no intention of doing so unprovoked, do you REALLY think that WW3 is going to happen among the more enlightened nations in the world? Yeah no. Even if North Korea fired nukes at the US or Japan or S. Korea, it wouldn't start WWIII. Even if Iran joined in, it wouldn't start WWIII. You know why? Because neither nation has enough nukes to overwhelm the anti-missile systems in place covering both nations for one thing, and even if they DID blow something up, the firepower that could be leveled against them by a single aircraft carrier group would do far more damage than a dozen nukes could without the nuclear fallout, China and Russia would NOT step in to defend those nations if they went rabid-dog, and they'd end up ground up and pasted.

So yes, this is a conversation about realism, let us know when you feel like joining in.

[Mystic]

I think he is thinking about political realism.

[Something completely different]

I think he is thinking about political realism.

Seriously?!

Do you also see the third world war coming? Or believe that there will be some kind of godly judgement via catastrophies.

I have a clear opinion on junkyardhobogenitalherpesfuck

He is one of these people who lust for war, conflict and suffering because in their deluded minds they think that this can finaly bring the end of the world on everyone and that "godly judgement" will finaly come.
A pathetic bunch of morons and antisocial imbicills is what he represents, a bunch of twats who got bored of waiting for an apocalypse, which they refuse to accept will not come and therefor drool for it to come via mankind`s wars. As if their god was too incompetent to bring on the apocalypse himself.

These people belong to where thy always belonged: In ragged clothes, smelling of feces, urin and sick, standing on a box in some driveway, preaching that the apocalypse is coming, whilest no one is listening.

[Silver]

Do you also see the third world war coming?

I am not a huge war buff, but did many people see WWII coming?

[Shell B]

Do you also see the third world war coming?

I am not a huge war buff, but did many people see WWII coming?

Yes. War is way more predictable than you might think.

[Something completely different]

Do you also see the third world war coming?

I am not a huge war buff, but did many people see WWII coming?

If you read "Mein Kampf" which was published years before Hitler even came to power, you could clearly read through his war plans a decade before they were taken into action.

In "Mein Kampf", Hitler clearly expresses how eastern Europe should be cleansed of it`s population via starvation so room for life can be produced for the german people, he also makes no secret of the fact that he wants to exterminate the jews.



Wars dont just happen out of suprise, they are always predictable.

[Mystic]

All I meant to say, is that he is thinking of a different term by "realism". Realism in political science means something else. I think this is why he is talking about politics.

I don't believe in realism in the political science sense. It's a gross oversimplification of the world.