Posts: 32913
Threads: 1412
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: I am God
March 23, 2013 at 11:46 pm
(March 23, 2013 at 11:39 pm)jstrodel Wrote: I sincerely doubt that Einstein understands all aspects of how time relates to the nature of being.
Because you obviously do, relying upon unreliable theological concepts that cannot coexist with actual scientific fact. Please, spare us any more of your absurd claims of knowing exactly how this world works when your only source relies upon that which cannot be proven.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: I am God
March 23, 2013 at 11:58 pm
(March 23, 2013 at 11:39 pm)jstrodel Wrote: I am not well antiquated with physics
Clearly.
(March 23, 2013 at 11:39 pm)jstrodel Wrote: but I sincerely doubt that Einstein understands all aspects of how time relates to the nature of being.
And you do, right?
Posts: 1062
Threads: 9
Joined: March 1, 2013
Reputation:
6
RE: I am God
March 24, 2013 at 12:04 am
I never claimed that I did. Did Einstein ever prove the exact nature of how time comes into being or the origin of all matter? Where?
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: I am God
March 24, 2013 at 12:07 am
(This post was last modified: March 24, 2013 at 12:10 am by Jackalope.)
No. Again, the point whooshes over your head. You, by your own admission are weak in physics, yet you deem yourself capable of criticising work you can scarcely understand.
Not only that - but the things you claim science cannot demonstrate (perhaps rightfully so) are things that you yourself have shown yourself incapable of demonstrating.
You hold no moral high ground here.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: I am God
March 24, 2013 at 12:17 am
Posts: 1062
Threads: 9
Joined: March 1, 2013
Reputation:
6
RE: I am God
March 24, 2013 at 12:17 am
(This post was last modified: March 24, 2013 at 12:20 am by jstrodel.)
I didn't criticize Einstein's work, I could not say whether the theory of relativity is the best explanation, I just don't believe that the theory of relativity explains the relationship between the origin of being and time and how that relates to God. If someone shows me that it does, perhaps I would be an open theists. Open theists do not place God outside of time.
I am not a young earth creationist.
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: I am God
March 24, 2013 at 12:24 am
(March 24, 2013 at 12:17 am)jstrodel Wrote: I didn't criticize Einstein's work, I could not say whether the theory of relativity is the best explanation, I just don't believe that the theory of relativity explains the relationship between the origin of being and time and how that relates to God. If someone shows me that it does, perhaps I would be an open theists. Open theists do not place God outside of time.
Perhaps you ought to consider addressing the rest of my post. Most of the above has fuck all to do with what I was saying.
(March 24, 2013 at 12:17 am)jstrodel Wrote: I am not a young earth creationist.
Good. I'd feel the urge to mock you a whole lot more if you were.
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: I am God
March 24, 2013 at 1:09 am
(March 23, 2013 at 11:02 pm)Texas Sailor Wrote: @Drich
As God, it is of little value to me to provide proof to you. I am more powerful than you could possibly fathom. Clearly I am communicating through means of human technology, but I am using my powers to access this process from beyond the physical realm. You see? I can both be physical and non-physical at the same time! There will be no death of the great I AM, which coincidently, I AM. So, there will be no need for you to anticipate such a ressurection. Plus, what would be the point? I'm God. So 'god' did you not read what I wrote or did you not understand it? What i said is there are those who would demand proof from you and like with Jesus, kill you literally to get it.
Quote: Out of curiosity, would you care to share with the others why a lack of proof has never been a problem for believing in Gods in the past but has all of the sudden become so crucial?
Because there is no loack of Proof for all who A/S/K as outlined in Luke 11.
Quote:You've been claiming to know a fake God for a while now without any evidence and scoffed at others for requesting the same from you. Now all of the sudden you're a skeptic. Why?
Again it seem you did not understand what I said in my orginal response, (something an all knowing God would not have trouble with) but a pot smoking ex sailor might.
Quote:I mean, I know the answer whether you share or not (don't have to be God to know that) just wanted to give you an amnesty period with your fellow humans.
Ah, proably not as you seem to be having a completely seperate conversation with yourself. Because it doesn't seem like you even reading the Christian responses. You just think you know what is being said and reply back with crap that does not even apply to what has been said.
Posts: 32913
Threads: 1412
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: I am God
March 24, 2013 at 1:12 am
(March 24, 2013 at 1:09 am)Drich Wrote: Because there is no loack of Proof for all who A/S/K as outlined in Luke 11.
Yes, there is. A twelve year old girl prays nightly for god to prevent her father from raping her. Does god do anything? No. The difference between me and your non-existent god, is that I would do something if I knew she was in trouble.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: I am God
March 24, 2013 at 1:15 am
(March 24, 2013 at 1:09 am)Drich Wrote: Because there is no loack of Proof for all who A/S/K as outlined in Luke 11.
Except when there is.
|