Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 25, 2024, 2:02 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Republicans Introduces Bill To Require Political Approval Of Scientific Papers
#11
RE: Republicans Introduces Bill To Require Political Approval Of Scientific Papers
This bill is too asinine to pass an up or down vote. If people are concerned that it might pass, all a democrat (or properly concerned republican) has to do is attach an amendment that revokes religious based tax exemptions.

So much for Bobby Jindal, current Republican Governor of Louisiana, imploring Republicans to not be the party of stupid.
Reply
#12
RE: Republicans Introduces Bill To Require Political Approval Of Scientific Papers
Innovations and Technology brings too much money to pass this! Republicans love money!
Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan
Professional Watcher of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report!
Reply
#13
RE: Republicans Introduces Bill To Require Political Approval Of Scientific Papers
This news requires this picture

[Image: 1718974-facepalm_epic.jpg]
undefined
Reply
#14
RE: Republicans Introduces Bill To Require Political Approval Of Scientific Papers
(May 5, 2013 at 5:25 pm)cratehorus Wrote: this is only about blocking climate change bills.....no big deal

Might also be about some of the social 'sciences'. Take a look at what comes out of qualitative psychology or sociology, it's basically postmodernistic gobeldegook on the virtues of social justice (read: leftism) in which bias is embraced and included, rather than minimised.

Popcorn
Nemo me impune lacessit.
Reply
#15
RE: Republicans Introduces Bill To Require Political Approval Of Scientific Papers
[Image: 37316505.jpg]

Yes, because it's such a smart idea to make people who don't understand the field to judge if a research is appropriate or not.[/sarcasm]
When I was young, there was a god with infinite power protecting me. Is there anyone else who felt that way? And was sure about it? but the first time I fell in love, I was thrown down - or maybe I broke free - and I bade farewell to God and became human. Now I don't have God's protection, and I walk on the ground without wings, but I don't regret this hardship. I want to live as a person. -Arina Tanemura

Reply
#16
RE: Republicans Introduces Bill To Require Political Approval Of Scientific Papers
Yup, so lets stop letting politicians divert other people's money to it when those very politicians are in no position to judge the appropriateness.

Popcorn
Nemo me impune lacessit.
Reply
#17
RE: Republicans Introduces Bill To Require Political Approval Of Scientific Papers
We already have this...they're called government grants.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Reply
#18
RE: Republicans Introduces Bill To Require Political Approval Of Scientific Papers
(May 7, 2013 at 12:00 am)Polaris Wrote: We already have this...they're called government grants.

Not the same. The conducting of research must be approved to get grants. This law would require approval to publish the results of said research, after the politician(s) reviewed it.
John Adams Wrote:The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
Reply
#19
RE: Republicans Introduces Bill To Require Political Approval Of Scientific Papers
It's all going to end in tears.
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Scientific/objective purpose of human species, may be to replicate universes blue grey brain 6 1031 November 25, 2018 at 10:17 am
Last Post: unfogged
  Intelligent Design as a scientific theory? SuperSentient 26 5991 March 26, 2017 at 11:07 pm
Last Post: SuperSentient
Exclamation Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over? theBorg 26 4564 August 18, 2016 at 8:17 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Questioning Scientific Titans ScepticOrganism 19 3055 July 1, 2016 at 11:56 am
Last Post: CapnAwesome
  Scientific Studies IATIA 9 1827 May 11, 2016 at 7:48 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  The scientific version of good and bad Detective L Ryuzaki 15 5088 August 31, 2015 at 12:39 am
Last Post: Excited Penguin
  Scientific Adam and Eve Won2blv 52 14277 June 22, 2015 at 10:57 am
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  Scientific arguments for eating Organic/non-GMO food? CapnAwesome 15 4146 June 10, 2015 at 6:49 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho
  This is the terrifying legacy house Republicans are leaving us with orogenicman 15 2819 November 21, 2014 at 10:15 pm
Last Post: Heywood
  Ohio's antiscience bill unimproved Dolorian 7 1731 September 9, 2014 at 10:22 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)