BUTT SEX!!!!

[ideologue08]

How does he know that anal sex is rought?

Maybe he simply had the wrong partner when he tried it the first time.

---

Hey. I am sure you have alot of things listed which you considere to be a sin.
But....

So you think consensual homosexuality is the same as the rape of a child?

Why do you categorise it together with criminal offences?

When did I say you give a fuck...? If you're planning to then I'm not interested anyway, it's not one of the things I want to do with you, I hope you understand. I like you, but not that much...

What on earth are you talking about?

[Something completely different]

When did I say you give a fuck...? If you're planning to then I'm not interested anyway, it's not one of the things I want to do with you, I hope you understand. I like you, but not that much...

What kind of cognitive disonance must one suffer from to believe that the denouncement of his religious values is an invitation to anal sex???

My point is clear to even the dumbest child - You have your moral values based on religion which tell you that homosexuality is a sin - I say that they are worthless and do not give enought to base an argument against homosexuality. - In effect, I express disregard for moral values based on religion before you get the chance to throw them arround.

The misinterpertation of my text from your side was probably deliberate to flame the situation up again.

What on earth are you talking about?

You claim to disagree with the man in the video except for one point.

Then, when stating your arguments against homosexuality - you list it together with criminal offences such as the rape of children. In effect making your argument that homosexuality is a crime.

In effect you are even worse than the guy in the video.

[ideologue08]

He's got a lot of "hate" for a guy with a cross on his fucking baseball cap.

I guess that is a requirement, though.

He's a hypocrite. He's openly invoking the Bible to propagate what he considers to be ideal for America and yet if a Jew invokes the halakha laws, or a Hindu invokes the Vedas, or (probably his worst scenario) a muslim dares to invoke the Qur'an, he'd be up in arms about it. Separation of State and Church should mean exactly that.

---

What kind of cognitive disonance must one suffer from to believe that the denouncement of his religious values is an invitation to anal sex???

You claim to disagree with the man in the video except for one point.

Then, when stating your arguments against homosexuality - you list it together with criminal offences such as the rape of children. In effect making your argument that homosexuality is a crime.

Ok, right, here we go, the wheels are turning...

You're the idiot here, because you said don't give a fuck, to which I replied, that I didn't want or need to you give a fuck. What part of that can't your head compute?

I never stated my arguments against homosexuality, that's a flat out lie. You're lying. If you could read English, you would know that I was responding to a post by Faith No More. You're so bent on flaming that it's clouding your ability to internalize what your eyes are seeing.

[Something completely different]

Ok, right, here we go, the wheels are turning...

You're the idiot here, because you said don't give a fuck, to which I replied, that I didn't want or need to you give a fuck. What part of that can't your head compute?

Liar.

You wrote this:

When did I say you give a fuck...? If you're planning to then I'm not interested anyway, it's not one of the things I want to do with you, I hope you understand. I like you, but not that much...

which displais the eighter deliberate or non deliberate misinterpretation from your side, and not from mine.

By now claiming that you actualy wrote something completly different you only underlined your own dishonest intentions.

I never stated my arguments against homosexuality, that's a flat out lie.

Lol you lie, and then acuse me of being a liar.
Read your statements yourself:

I agree with what he said in the beginning about how homosexuality is a sin,

Well, most people wouldn't like others jerking off in public for example, or having sex with underage kids or babies etc.

You're lying.

Nope. And I just showed you that you were lying.

If you could read English, you would know that I was responding to a post by Faith No More.

Which does not mean that only he has the right to respond to it.

What do you think you are? Somekind of royalty?

You're so bent on flaming that it's clouding your ability to internalize what your eyes are seeing.

I am not. I am calm, you are not.

[ideologue08]

I am not. I am calm, you are not.

Actually you're not...you need to calm down.

It's ironic that you talk about misrepresentation of an argument when you've clearly misrepresented mine. You are a liar, because not only did you lie, but you feel justified in lying.

I'm saying once again, I was responding to a post by Faith No More, only willful ignorance is driving you on here.

[Something completely different]

Actually you're not...you need to calm down.

It's ironic that you talk about misrepresentation of an argument when you've clearly misrepresented mine. You are a liar, because not only did you lie, but you feel justified in lying.

It says everything one needs to know, that you ignored every single arguments I made against this motion of yours, and simply resort to reposting accusations without the arguments and evidence to beck these up. I did, you ignored it. - proving that you are wrong and deliberatly misinterpreting with dishonest intent.

I'm saying once again, I was responding to a post by Faith No More, only willful ignorance is driving you on here.

I replied because I wanted to, only because Faith No More replied this doesnt mean that you are entitled to have a reply only by him.

What kind of cognitive disonance must one have to state that the participation in a debate by an individual can only be due to that individual`s "ignorance". You probably dont even know what ignorance is. It is exactly the oppposite of "ignoring" a debate and not participating in it.

I guess, you are simply a sociopath trying to gain some attention here through various attempts of setting this forum ablaze by insulting members and behaving like if you were somekind of sultan to whom everyone here has to be greatfull towars, when he replies.

This is an open forum which welcomes everyone who wants to debate.

You obviously dont want to debate.

A"nd at the end of a conversation I usualy say, "Auf Wiedersehen" but since "Auf Wiedersehen" means "Until I see you again", To you I will simply say "Good Bye"."

[ideologue08]

I guess, you are simply a sociopath trying to gain some attention here

Not really, in fact it seems you're the one trying to gain attention...otherwise you wouldn't have so spectacularly misrepresented my position in such a manner and then not cease to lie about it...

Nowhere have I justified my opposition to homosexuality in such a manner, you're basically in self-delusion. I was replying to a specific point in a specific manner.

It's a nice touch there, I think that line was from Inglorious if I'm not mistaken? It was a fantastic film, one of the best.

[Whateverist]

What .. what? In the butt?

[Faith No More]

Well, most people wouldn't like others jerking off in public for example, or having sex with underage kids or babies etc. So... yeah, people do stick their nose into other people's use of their private parts

Let me clarify then. Why are religious people so obsessed with what others do with their genitals behind closed doors?

[Raven]

Well, most people wouldn't like others jerking off in public for example, or having sex with underage kids or babies etc. So... yeah, people do stick their nose into other people's use of their private parts

Let me clarify then. Why are religious people so obsessed with what others do with their genitals behind closed doors?

They cannot abide the thought that those damned heathens are having any fun, that's why. These fucktards are so puritanical it's truly pathetic.