Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 6, 2025, 3:22 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Zimmerman verdict: Not Guilty.
RE: Zimmerman verdict: Not Guilty.
(August 1, 2013 at 2:26 pm)Red Celt Wrote:
(July 26, 2013 at 5:54 pm)Tiberius Wrote: and as we all know...power corrupts.
Like the power to drive around a gated community, deciding who is (and who is not) acting "suspiciously". With a gun.
You realize everyone has that power right?
Reply
RE: Zimmerman verdict: Not Guilty.
(August 1, 2013 at 3:28 pm)Tiberius Wrote:
(August 1, 2013 at 2:26 pm)Red Celt Wrote: Like the power to drive around a gated community, deciding who is (and who is not) acting "suspiciously". With a gun.
You realize everyone has that power right?

In your country, perhaps. Thankfully... not in mine.
[Image: ascent_descent422.jpg]
Tho' Nature, red in tooth and celt
With ravine, shriek'd against his creed

Red Celt's Blog
Reply
RE: Zimmerman verdict: Not Guilty.
(August 1, 2013 at 3:28 pm)Tiberius Wrote:
(August 1, 2013 at 2:26 pm)Red Celt Wrote: Like the power to drive around a gated community, deciding who is (and who is not) acting "suspiciously". With a gun.
You realize everyone has that power right?

In certain states. That is the problem.
Reply
RE: Zimmerman verdict: Not Guilty.
No, it's not a problem. There is nothing inherently wrong with driving around deciding people are suspicious, even if you do have a gun.
Reply
RE: Zimmerman verdict: Not Guilty.
Excused me, boss ( and I will say this as politely as I possibly can) but you are out of your fucking mind.
Reply
RE: Zimmerman verdict: Not Guilty.
I'm sorry, but people make decisions like that automatically. You see someone doing something shady; you think they are suspicious. There isn't anything wrong with that. The fact that you may have a gun with you doesn't make it wrong either.

Now, if you decide to take the law into your own hands and use your gun against them because they were being suspicious, that is where it becomes wrong.
Reply
RE: Zimmerman verdict: Not Guilty.
(August 2, 2013 at 2:56 am)Tiberius Wrote: I'm sorry, but people make decisions like that automatically. You see someone doing something shady; you think they are suspicious. There isn't anything wrong with that. The fact that you may have a gun with you doesn't make it wrong either.

Now, if you decide to take the law into your own hands and use your gun against them because they were being suspicious, that is where it becomes wrong.

Aaaaand... the loop is closed.

(July 26, 2013 at 5:54 pm)Tiberius Wrote: as we all know...power corrupts.

(waits for the sound of a penny dropping)
[Image: ascent_descent422.jpg]
Tho' Nature, red in tooth and celt
With ravine, shriek'd against his creed

Red Celt's Blog
Reply
RE: Zimmerman verdict: Not Guilty.
^ Haha awesome.

(August 2, 2013 at 2:56 am)Tiberius Wrote: I'm sorry, but people make decisions like that automatically. You see someone doing something shady; you think they are suspicious. There isn't anything wrong with that. The fact that you may have a gun with you doesn't make it wrong either.

Now, if you decide to take the law into your own hands and use your gun against them because they were being suspicious, that is where it becomes wrong.

Yeah, but some idiot going around with a gun, ready to use said gun, thinking a kid is suspicous....leads to him taking the law into his own hands and using the gun!

I just have trouble understanding that you think it's fine for someone armed with a firearm to stalk another person because this someone thinks this person "looks suspicious". The situation can't lead to anything good; it's only logical that that it leads to very bad things.
ronedee Wrote:Science doesn't have a good explaination for water

[Image: YAAgdMk.gif]



Reply
RE: Zimmerman verdict: Not Guilty.
(August 1, 2013 at 12:01 pm)Dionysius Wrote:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ebu6Yvzs4Ls


I think the first posting didn't appreciate the hotlinking. The second, hopefully will be a little more enduring.

What is interesting about this video is the very end where Bill comments on the media's attempt to link Trayvon with the pseudo-philosophic legacy of MLK. It truly is a slap in the face!

Can we [mankind] really be so stupid as to be continually duped by the MSM and the corporate world all in the name of money?
"This time the bullet cold rocked ya a yellow ribbon instead of a swastika?" -RATM
Reply
RE: Zimmerman verdict: Not Guilty.
[Image: TrayvonMartin_zps6ad8cc5a.jpg]
[Image: ascent_descent422.jpg]
Tho' Nature, red in tooth and celt
With ravine, shriek'd against his creed

Red Celt's Blog
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Atheists, George Zimmerman and the burden of proof là bạn điên 89 22455 February 17, 2014 at 11:27 pm
Last Post: là bạn điên
  Is Obama guilty of war crimes? Manowar 127 28237 January 16, 2014 at 6:11 pm
Last Post: paintpooper
  Zimmerman's Girlfriend Asks Judge To Drop Charges A Theist 6 2369 December 10, 2013 at 5:47 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  George Zimmerman continues to flaunt the fact that he got away with murder Ryantology 28 5941 November 20, 2013 at 11:43 am
Last Post: Doubting Thomas
  George Zimmerman: Weak Prosecution wolf39us 15 4509 July 8, 2013 at 5:39 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Arizona's Sheriff Shitstain Guilty of Racial Profiling Minimalist 7 3015 May 24, 2013 at 9:33 pm
Last Post: Cato
  Martin and Zimmerman - A reasoned logical discussion Puddleglum 27 12111 September 12, 2012 at 9:34 pm
Last Post: Puddleglum
  Perhaps Zimmerman Wasn't So Bad Minimalist 18 6623 April 4, 2012 at 8:17 pm
Last Post: mediamogul
  Societal Scapegoat or Guilty as Charged? Cinjin 31 7657 August 22, 2011 at 4:47 pm
Last Post: Ace Otana



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)