Posts: 4
Threads: 1
Joined: August 17, 2013
Reputation:
0
Support of a claim
August 17, 2013 at 2:02 pm
Hi, I am new here and agnostic, and was looking for an intelligent answer (or non-answer)....
I do not know one way or the other whether or not there is a god but I noticed in my studies of Philosophy that it is a huge topic producing around 15 or so arguments demonstrating the probability for, and yet none that I could find actually negating the probability. Can you help direct me to philosophical studies that demonstrate there cannot be a god(s) or designer (I know the one is not necessary argument and am not looking for a barrage of insults)...I see many people make the blanket claim that there is none, so please show me some arguments, factual basis, or direct me to accepted philosophers who I may read on this subject.
Thanks
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
155
RE: Support of a claim
August 17, 2013 at 2:18 pm
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 2889
Threads: 133
Joined: May 8, 2011
Reputation:
31
RE: Support of a claim
August 17, 2013 at 3:13 pm
The problem with many of the arguments for the existence of god is even though the argument is valid it may not be sound because a premise it contains is a presupposition. For example the cosmological argument in all its many forms all boil down to one thing. That one thing is a necessary being that was the first cause, and that necessary being is defined as god. However the simple truth is that presupposition may be false. The universe may not require a cause, and may itself be necessary.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
Posts: 2168
Threads: 9
Joined: June 21, 2013
Reputation:
27
RE: Support of a claim
August 17, 2013 at 4:28 pm
The existence of god isn't really a philosophical question though? I mean if you're looking to definitively determine if god exists, the only avenue available is the scientific method. Even if god could logically exist, until you find evidence supporting his existence, you still cannot say he exists. However because the god hypothesis is so poorly defined (what is a god?), it's not testable.
In short: how are we to answer the question when no one has determined which question to ask?
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Support of a claim
August 17, 2013 at 4:33 pm
When philosophy begins to deal in facts rather than semantics I'll pay attention to it.
Meanwhile, there is no evidence for any of the gods which humanity has seen fit to invent throughout history.
Thinking about that last sentence should give you some idea of an answer, though.
Posts: 9147
Threads: 83
Joined: May 22, 2013
Reputation:
45
RE: Support of a claim
August 17, 2013 at 6:17 pm
(August 17, 2013 at 2:02 pm)pshun2404 Wrote: Hi, I am new here and agnostic, and was looking for an intelligent answer (or non-answer)....
I do not know one way or the other whether or not there is a god but I noticed in my studies of Philosophy that it is a huge topic producing around 15 or so arguments demonstrating the probability for, and yet none that I could find actually negating the probability. Can you help direct me to philosophical studies that demonstrate there cannot be a god(s) or designer (I know the one is not necessary argument and am not looking for a barrage of insults)...I see many people make the blanket claim that there is none, so please show me some arguments, factual basis, or direct me to accepted philosophers who I may read on this subject.
Thanks You can easily prove there's no God, under a particular definition. For example, you can disprove the Christian God with omni-3 arguments.
You can't prove an undefined. Try proving "X does not exist," without knowing what X is. So proving that NO God, under any kind of definition, exists is hopeless.
Posts: 35257
Threads: 122
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Support of a claim
August 17, 2013 at 6:57 pm
(This post was last modified: August 17, 2013 at 7:20 pm by Angrboda.)
Posts: 8719
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
53
RE: Support of a claim
August 17, 2013 at 10:17 pm
(August 17, 2013 at 2:18 pm)Stimbo Wrote: ... You could never know ...the laws of physics might be rewritten. Actually, I think the same about atheism. If the natural order is arbitrary then it can arbitrarily change.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
155
RE: Support of a claim
August 17, 2013 at 10:43 pm
Problem there though, Chad, is that we already know - for a given value of 'know' anyway - that the natural order isn't arbitrary. The other problem of course is that has nothing to do with atheism, so you just wasted a torpedo on the wrong target.
On the other hand, as I say if reality is governed on the whim of a god, there would be no reason to suppose that anything would work consistently and actually every reason to suppose that they wouldn't.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 13900
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Support of a claim
August 18, 2013 at 5:10 am
(August 17, 2013 at 2:02 pm)pshun2404 Wrote: Hi, I am new here and agnostic, and was looking for an intelligent answer (or non-answer)....
I do not know one way or the other whether or not there is a god but I noticed in my studies of Philosophy that it is a huge topic producing around 15 or so arguments demonstrating the probability for, and yet none that I could find actually negating the probability. Can you help direct me to philosophical studies that demonstrate there cannot be a god(s) or designer (I know the one is not necessary argument and am not looking for a barrage of insults)...I see many people make the blanket claim that there is none, so please show me some arguments, factual basis, or direct me to accepted philosophers who I may read on this subject.
Thanks
Arguments without evidence to back them up are just so much verbal masterbation and not worth the time it takes to read them.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
|