Christians Endorse God's Hatred

[Foxaèr]

why can't you learn anything from what others have shown you.

GC

The same comment can be directed toward you.

[Godscreated]

So, you believe when a few priest rape

Continue adhering to a religion that those chosen by god promote, and in the end you are supporting precisely what harm they have done to humanity.

I've said from day one that anyone that uses a child for sex should be put to death, it is totally unacceptable behavior. I'm not sure if the Catholic Church believes that priests are called by God, from what I've heard they can decide to be a priest without a call from God, but like I say that's what I've heard.

GC

[Foxaèr]

I've said from day one that anyone that uses a child for sex should be put to death.

GC

Understandable. However, the only difference between one denomination and another is interpretation of scripture. You all still believe in the same god.

[Neo-Scholastic]

I agree that a desire to avoid any sense of shame for libertine attitudes about sex is a strong motivation for some atheists. Given a choice between faith in God and unrestricted sexual freedom they choose the sex.

[Foxaèr]

Given a choice between faith in God and unrestricted sexual freedom they choose the sex.

The only thing involved in relation to choice connected with religion is realizing that reality is preferable over fantasy.

[Captain Colostomy]

Zen Badger, the prohibition of homosexuality is blatantly clear right there in the 10 commandments, "Thou shall not covet thy neighbor's ass..."

Heh. So the act itself isn't an issue, just the desire leading up to it. Now add that to christians who believe thinking gay isn't the issue, but acting on those impulses. (Not to mention those who are fully accepting, and those wholly rejecting.) Seems god's will on the subject is clear as mud.

[Jacob(smooth)]

via Imgflip Meme Maker

This is very familiar ground for me. To agnostic for the christians, to theist for the atheists. Love you too Lion.

Like it or not the church, Catholic AND other, has a large number of beams in our own eyes. Unless we are at least honest about the fact, we have absolutely zero moral authority to even talk about what other people are doing, much less try to get them to follow standards we can't. The sooner the church wakes up to this the better.

Catholic priests, in considerable numbers, raped small children and worse, were protected from the consequences of this vile crime by the church in which those children had placed their trust. On that basis how dare we try to impose our views on what constitutes marriage to people who don't share our beliefs. How dare we even talk about sexual morality?

Shame on us.

So, you believe when a few priest rape, that the rest of the Christians are guilty, how does this kind of attitude differ from the atheist? If you want to take on the guilt of these priest go ahead, but do not expect the Christians here to believe you are even close to being Jesus. Do not lump us in with those who have decides to do evil in the church, shame on you.

GC

Lol. How does this kind of attitude differ from "the atheist" (which one?!). I dunno. Perhaps it doesn't.

Crazy, left field idea for you. Perhaps, just perhaps "the atheist" might be right about some stuff. Don't want to be coming at you with these wild ideas about religion, but I don't think that how we view that particular scandal is an issue of faith. Funny how you seem to assume that Christians and atheists should automatically have different views on kiddie fiddling priests and a massive organised cover up.

As to the christians here not thinking I'm "close to being Jesus", I'm gutted to hear you say that. And there I thought I'd convinced you I was, in fact close to being jesus. Bollocks. What game me away as not being Jesus. Was it the name? It was the name wasn't it.

Have I convinced any atheists that I'm close to being Jesus I wonder. If not I'm going home now.

On the subject of Jesus, how much did he preach on homosexuality? That would be not at all. However he did have some choice words for people who judged those around them when the ground they stood on was none too solid. Spoke about that quite a bit! So how many churches, or even individual Christians, are there who are without sin, and therefore able to throw stones, on sexual morality. What do you think he'd make of church today.

---

Or that a disobedient child should be stoned to death by the whole town?

This has been shown here many times to be the wrong interpretation of the verse, why can't you learn anything from what others have shown you.

GC

The wrong interpretation? Or the one you don't like.

Well, if you don't fancy throwing the stones at the kids, we could always throw the kids at the stones

“Happy is he who repays you for what you have done to us – he who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks"

What's the correct interpretation of that one?

[Faith No More]

I agree that a desire to avoid any sense of shame for libertine attitudes about sex is a strong motivation for some atheists. Given a choice between faith in God and unrestricted sexual freedom they choose the sex.

Yeah, it couldn't possibly be because the only evidence you have for your god are your own self-righteous delusions.

You sure got me pegged. I know god exists, but I just want to buttfuck!

Fuck me that's dumb.

---

---

[Neo-Scholastic]

I agree that a desire to avoid any sense of shame for libertine attitudes about sex is a strong motivation for some atheists. Given a choice between faith in God and unrestricted sexual freedom they choose the sex.

Yeah, it couldn't possibly be because the only evidence you have for your god are your own self-righteous delusions.

You sure got me pegged. I know god exists, but I just want to buttfuck!

Fuck me that's dumb.

---

---

Only you would know. Search your heart and ask yourself if your disbelief is purely intellectual. Seems that atheists are quick to attribute our belief to anxiety over death. But when it comes to their lack of belief they insist its all about the lack of evidence rather than convincing themselves that fornication is harmless fun.

...and did you say 'pegged'?

[Ryantology]

I agree that a desire to avoid any sense of shame for libertine attitudes about sex is a strong motivation for some atheists. Given a choice between faith in God and unrestricted sexual freedom they choose the sex.

If God didn't want us to enjoy sex so much, he could have designed us so that sex wasn't something we would want to seek in pleasure. He could have made us seasonal animals, like so many others. He could have made it so that sexual reproduction was as boring as it is for plants. He could have made it so that reproduction was only possible through prayer. He chose not to.

If he didn't want two guys having buttsex, he could have made it so that we didn't excrete. He could have made it so that the prostate gland wasn't loaded with pleasure receptors.

Seriously. God's attitude towards sex is like pouring sugar on the floor and then getting pissed off at the ants.