Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 2:50 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Top 1%
#31
RE: The Top 1%
Time for this.



Reply
#32
RE: The Top 1%
I miss George Carlin.
Reply
#33
RE: The Top 1%
Ditto.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens

"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".

- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "

- Dr. Donald Prothero
Reply
#34
RE: The Top 1%
I think it's about damn time the country admits it: there are advantages and disadvantages to both capialism and communism. It isn't an either/or thing; it's incorporating both into our culture.

Look at the computers and cell phones we use. Those are innovations of capitalism. Capitalists, in competition with each other, are constantly trying to make the next computer faster, the next phone more covenient, the next car more comfortable just so they can keep up with their competition who are doing the same thing. Yes, good, competitive capitalism pushes innovation.

But there are plenty of fields where completely unregulated capitalism has led to disaster and we don't really get anything for an added investment. Look at the banking system we have where all that innovation is being used to find more creative ways to screw us over. Look at our healthcare system that used innovation of capitalism to find creative reasons to deny coverage to people when they need it. Look at defense contractors who are finding creative ways to put their product to use (no matter how many people have to get killed for it).

So, my proposal is that most industries are well regulated by the government whose basic job is to protect the public. They should also have a government/public option for many of these services, to set the bar for the private sector to meet if they want to stay competitive.
I live on facebook. Come see me there. http://www.facebook.com/tara.rizzatto

"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama
Reply
#35
RE: The Top 1%
(November 24, 2013 at 4:40 pm)MarxRaptor Wrote: it means the abolition of private property; while maintaining personal property.

Seriously? Where do you draw that line?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
#36
RE: The Top 1%
(December 2, 2013 at 4:37 pm)Chas Wrote:
(November 24, 2013 at 4:40 pm)MarxRaptor Wrote: it means the abolition of private property; while maintaining personal property.

Seriously? Where do you draw that line?

Using imagination, of course.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
#37
RE: The Top 1%
(December 2, 2013 at 4:23 pm)TaraJo Wrote: I think it's about damn time the country admits it: there are advantages and disadvantages to both capialism and communism. It isn't an either/or thing; it's incorporating both into our culture.

Yeah. It's called democratic socialism. I have a large place in my heart for it.

Quote:Democratic Socialists of America: Democratic socialists do not want to create an all-powerful government bureaucracy. But we do not want big corporate bureaucracies to control our society either. Rather, we believe that social and economic decisions should be made by those whom they most affect.

Today, corporate executives who answer only to themselves and a few wealthy stockholders make basic economic decisions affecting millions of people. Resources are used to make money for capitalists rather than to meet human needs. We believe that the workers and consumers who are affected by economic institutions should own and control them.

Social ownership could take many forms, such as worker-owned cooperatives or publicly owned enterprises managed by workers and consumer representatives. Democratic socialists favor as much decentralization as possible. While the large concentrations of capital in industries such as energy and steel may necessitate some form of state ownership, many consumer-goods industries might be best run as cooperatives.

Democratic socialists have long rejected the belief that the whole economy should be centrally planned. While we believe that democratic planning can shape major social investments like mass transit, housing, and energy, market mechanisms are needed to determine the demand for many consumer goods.

Emphases, mine.
Reply
#38
RE: The Top 1%
(December 2, 2013 at 4:37 pm)Chas Wrote:
(November 24, 2013 at 4:40 pm)MarxRaptor Wrote: it means the abolition of private property; while maintaining personal property.

Seriously? Where do you draw that line?
Private property is land or the means of production (which we be created communally) , all of which will be collectivized after the revolution. Personal property is that with is personally created or manufactured. All your personal possessions, including your home & car (exempting your land, as that was not personally created, nor is it a personal possession).

Private property is also that which is used for sustenance. This must be abolished so that all can have access to the essential means of sustenance. Factories of all sorts are private property.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The SPLC - All White at the Top John V 29 4846 April 24, 2018 at 10:05 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  On top of all the disturbing things in SOTU speech Brian37 0 454 February 1, 2018 at 9:30 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Top Russian Officials Discussed How to Influence Trump Aides Last Summer Silver 5 1902 May 25, 2017 at 8:27 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Top 10 Reasons Why Palin Would Make a Better President Than Trump YahwehIsTheWay 3 1151 April 18, 2017 at 8:00 pm
Last Post: brewer
  The Whiny Little Bitch Didn't Even Make the top of the news out here today Minimalist 11 2168 January 21, 2017 at 9:26 pm
Last Post: J a c k
Video Top Chris Christie aide breaks rank and supports Clinton Kosh 0 485 August 2, 2016 at 10:00 pm
Last Post: Kosh
  Why were top nazi officials Jewish? I and I 20 5363 January 2, 2014 at 11:35 am
Last Post: EgoRaptor
  Top 1% Captured 93% Of Income Gains In 2010 reverendjeremiah 4 1938 March 6, 2012 at 8:04 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)