Slavery (on Thursdays)

[ronedee]

Just read my quote emblazoned [by him] in his signature.... and it will become very clear what matters to Exlax. And the fruitlessness of any conversations with him.

Oh, I just thought that quote was a hilarious, histrionic overreaction...

LOL! And... dead-on!

[Esquilax]

... Just so long as you see it too.

[fr0d0]

So basically, you've got jack shit, but don't want to admit it. Gotcha.

If you say it last that makes you right yes? That's the only way I see you winning here. I wish you happiness with your delusions. Hypocrit.

[Bad Wolf]

The only reason you wouldn't explain why you agree after being asked so many times, is because you've got jack shit.

[fr0d0]

So the question is: what is 2 + 2. The answer is given: 4.

You ask again: what is 2 + 2

The respondent states that the question is answered.

You ask again, demanding an answer, maybe a better explanation of the answer, because you don't get it.

The respondent breaks it down for you.

Still you don't understand

The respondent states that there is no further explanation possible

You claim that the respondent never answered, so must be wrong. You must be right because you don't understand.

[Esquilax]

You ask again, demanding an answer, maybe a better explanation of the answer, because you don't get it.

The respondent breaks it down for you.

When the fuck did you do that? All you did is accuse me of mistranslating without explaining why, despite the fact that I actually switched translations to be more in line with the bible Huggy uses, and then asserted that my contentions were groundless, again without explaining why!

I'd hardly call that "breaking it down." No, what I'd call that is "being an evasive jackass." Now unless you actually have something to say on the topic at hand, and not just on how your deluded ass mind has convinced you you've already won the argument without saying a word, then just GTFO.

I don't have any interest in jousting around the point, when I could be discussing something useful. I'd actually hoped that you'd maybe explain your position, rather than just telling me how much better it is than mine, sight unseen. But I guess you'd rather talk about talking, rather than the topic of the thread.

[fr0d0]

I have never addressed your points esq in case you hadn't noticed. I have said that huggy has said everything there is to say. The respondent above is him. It's becoming clearer why you don't get it.

[Esquilax]

I have never addressed your points esq in case you hadn't noticed. I have said that huggy has said everything there is to say. The respondent above is him. It's becoming clearer why you don't get it.

Oh no, I was being charitable.

In that case, you are an evasive jackass. Congrats.

I've already explained to you that I find Huggy's responses, as I've understood them, to be insufficient, where they aren't outright dishonest. That was the instigating factor in my asking you to explain what you found so compelling about them, since you apparently do. Your inability to articulate what's so great about them has been noted.

To recap, this is how the dialogue has gone so far:

My position is that I don't find Huggy's answers to be compelling or truthful in the least.

Your answer is that Huggy has already answered my points.

I then press you on this, seeking to figure out what it is that you found so effective about him crowing over the word "noun" while avoiding answering my question.

Your response is that Huggy has answered my questions.

If anyone isn't getting this, it's you. Why do you even come here, if you're so unwilling to engage in discussion?

[fr0d0]

Insult insult >word<

[Esquilax]

Insult insult >word<

That must be easier than ever furnishing a cogent response, yes.

Meanwhile, my contentions still stand, as you're apparently unable to answer for them, or even explain where other people have.