Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 20, 2024, 10:23 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The redneck strike again.
RE: The redneck strike again.
(August 4, 2014 at 8:45 am)Stimbo Wrote: My kundalini is so deep smashing, it has its own pineal gland. Or something.

That was so deep it went over your head a little too, huh?
Reply
RE: The redneck strike again.
Deep is best.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: The redneck strike again.
Wow .. you did it again.
Reply
RE: The redneck strike again.
Panic what is even going on now whatevs. I feel confuzzled Panic
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: The redneck strike again.
(August 3, 2014 at 3:44 pm)Confused Ape Wrote: So, in other words you can't prove that God is outside and everywhere as well as within. The awareness is purely subjective so where and what God is has to be a belief. There's a remote possibility that it's a correct belief because your concept of God isn't one that's been disproved as yet. On the other hand, your interpretation of the subjective God experience could be wrong.


Suppose you love your man.
Now i ask you to prove to me that your love for him is real.
Gimmah..... the evidence Ape i ask.
Can you transfer into my consciousness the love that you feel for him?
Can you? Thinking


Quote:I think her experience shows how the brain is involved. Maybe Ramachandran is right about the possibility of humans having a God antenna but that's not something that can be proved.


Physical science and intuitional science are two different things.
In between there is a border.
Once you cross that border you can better understand what there is on the other side.
So far physical science still stick to the physical side of the human being so it is quite natural that theories don't get very far.


Quote:The theory part is simply an explanation and labels for what's going on in the unconscious. When you make posts about yoga you're talking about the theory behind it and using labels like pineal gland and kundalini. Jungian psychology, like yoga, has to be applied which means getting inside the car and driving.


All very good Ape.
I am not saying that you are wrong.
I am only saying that without practice is all futile.
Now how do you apply Jungian theory by turning theory into practice? Thinking


Quote:Why is God just a Him? If God is everywhere and in everything it will be Her and It as well.


For ages and ages to describe men and women people say.....Man.
That doesn't sound very good to women but that is the way it goes.
I didn't invent it so don't blame me.
The same thing goes for God.
People say Him even if God does not have sex.
You are correct in pointing out that but again it is a way to express an idea. Angel
Reply
RE: The redneck strike again.
(August 4, 2014 at 11:57 am)Riketto Wrote: Suppose you love your man.
Now i ask you to prove to me that your love for him is real.
Gimmah..... the evidence Ape i ask.
Can you transfer into my consciousness the love that you feel for him?
Can you? Thinking

You'd have to take my word that I love my husband but there's one big difference between him and God. I know that my husband exists and so do a lot of other people. There's also official documentation to show he exists as well.

(August 4, 2014 at 11:57 am)Riketto Wrote: Physical science and intuitional science are two different things.
In between there is a border.
Once you cross that border you can better understand what there is on the other side.
So far physical science still stick to the physical side of the human being so it is quite natural that theories don't get very far.

I found an article about Intuitional Science - is this what you mean?

Quote:This experience reflects a certain level of intuition. As one learns to meditate deeply, access to subtler layers of the mind becomes increasingly common. Most of the time we are only aware of the mundane layers of the mind, the layers in which we think and interact with the world. The subtler layers of the mind, however, are associated with universal knowledge.

When flashes of insight from these deeper layers of the mind enter the conscious mind, they often take the form of a thought or image that is indistinguishable from the many random thoughts and images that enter our minds daily. It is often only in retrospect that we realize certain thoughts were actually intuitional insights. Over time one becomes more trusting of this process and relaxes while many problems and aspects of life just seem to take care of themselves.

“Intuition” is a mental process that is not intellectual; it is beyond the intellect, a more subtle form of cognition. One name for yogic meditation is “intuitional science.” The goal of this intuitional science, however, is not access to knowledge of the physical or mental worlds. It is called “intuitional science” because realization of the spiritual goal is not an intellectual process; it is not something you can learn from a book or be taught in the usual sense.

Meditation is intuitional in that it is a psycho-spiritual process in which the totality of one’s psychic identity is associated intuitionally with infinite consciousness.

The bolded bit is very Jungian - the only difference here is that I interpret 'universal knowledge' as being from what Jung called the Collective Unconscious - this is the layer of the mind which is the same in all humans. It's our biological programming for being human which includes instincts shared by other animals.

(August 4, 2014 at 11:57 am)Riketto Wrote: All very good Ape.
I am not saying that you are wrong.
I am only saying that without practice is all futile.
Now how do you apply Jungian theory by turning theory into practice? Thinking

One technique is dream interpretation for dreams which 'feel' important. When Apollo turned up in one of my dreams he had an awesome presence and I knew in the dream that he was a god. I treated Apollo as a symbol of something which my unconscious was trying to tell me and figured it out after a lot of work. Another technique is 'active imagination' which is a way of going within.

(August 4, 2014 at 11:57 am)Riketto Wrote: People say Him even if God does not have sex.
You are correct in pointing out that but again it is a way to express an idea. Angel

That's fine. You're just saying Him because it's conventional to do so and yoga doesn't teach that God is male.
Badger Badger Badger Badger Where are the snake and mushroom smilies?
Reply
RE: The redneck strike again.
[Image: vil-serpent.gif][Image: champi.gif]
Reply
RE: The redneck strike again.
Intuitional science.

ROFLOL

/thread
Reply
RE: The redneck strike again.
Are people still fucking talking about this?

The only thing I've taken out of this thread is that Enrico/Riketto's brain should be donated for scientific research. We need to determine how a brain can still function with its structural components dictating logic and reasoning completely dormant.
freedomfromfallacy » I'm weighing my tears to see if the happy ones weigh the same as the sad ones.
Reply
RE: The redneck strike again.
(August 4, 2014 at 6:42 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Intuitional science.

ROFLOL

/thread

Yeah, he still hasn't told me what's in the green box yet.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)