RE: Question for the theist
April 1, 2014 at 5:41 pm
(April 1, 2014 at 5:23 pm)xr34p3rx Wrote: yes you do, in order for me to know what god you believe in, you must define him/her/it.
We're discussing evidence, not god, and I doubt many people find that drawing you posted to be convincing evidence, although sadly I might be wrong on that.
Quote:predictions? does science not predict things? need to look that up buddy
It's your position - provide the evidence.
Quote:despite the evidence that science has given, just proves your ignorance...
So dispel my ignorance by providing evidence.
Quote:its not semantics dude, believe = accept something as true.
Then you're badgering, as you had already asked if I accept creationism - unless you're saying that ID isn't creationism.
Quote:then give me a brief overview, that would help
It would help if you give more specific questions.
Quote:demonstrably false? ok then... prove it wrong yourself. science already proved it probable, you are ignorant, prove it wrong then.... go on... do it
I already have proven that claim wrong with several articles showing that genetic studies can give very different results than morphological studies. You're denying the evidence that's been given to you.
Quote:i emphasized that, fossils are on the animal side, and genetics are on both sides of the evidence, and someone else also rephrased it better to, both sides lead to the same conclusion.
And I've given evidence that the two sides can lead to very different conclusions, but you deny the evidence that's been given to you.
